AAAS. (2001). American Association for the Advancement of Science. Atlas of Science Literacy (Project 2061). Mapping K-12 science learning. Washington, DC: Author. http://www.project2061.org/publications/atlas
Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136.
Article
Google Scholar
Ambrose, S., Bridges, M., Lovett, M., DiPietro, M., & Norman, M. (2010). How learning works: 7 research- based principles for smart teaching. Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
Google Scholar
Ausubel, D. (1963). Cognitive structure and the facilitation of meaningful verbal learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 14(2), 217–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248716301400220
Article
Google Scholar
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt Rinehart.
Google Scholar
Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Google Scholar
Baltaoğlu, M. G., & Güven, M. (2019). Relationship between self-efficacy, learning strategies and learning styles of teacher candidates (Anadolu University example). South African Journal of Education, 39(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v39n2a1579
Article
Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
Google Scholar
Bartimote-Aufflick, K., Bridgeman, A., Walker, R., Sharma, M., & Smith, L. (2016). The study, evaluation, and improvement of university student self-efficacy. Studies in Higher Education, 41(11), 1918–1942. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.999319
Article
Google Scholar
Berebitsky, D., & Salloum, S. J. (2017). The relationship between collective efficacy and teachers’ social networks in urban middle schools. Area Open, 3(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858417743927
Article
Google Scholar
Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. National Academy Press.
Google Scholar
Bressington, D. T., Wong, W. K., Lam, K. K. C., & Chien, W. T. (2018). Concept mapping to promote meaningful learning, help relate theory to practice and improve learning self-efficacy in Asian mental health nursing students: A mixed methods pilot study. Nurse Education Today, 60, 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.09.019
Article
Google Scholar
Bretz, S. L., Fay, M., Bruck, L. B., & Towns, M. H. (2013). What faculty interviews reveal about meaningful learning in the undergraduate chemistry laboratory. Journal of Chemistry Education, 90(3), 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed300384r
Article
Google Scholar
Buzan, T. (2009b). Muhteşem hafızanızla tanışın. Hakan Öneş (Ed.), İstanbul: Boyut.
Buzan, T. (2009a). Akıl haritaları: yaratıcılığınızı harekete geçirin ve dönüştürün. Hakan Öneş (Ed.). Istanbul: Boyut.
Cañas, A., & Novak, J. (2019). Concept mapping using Cmap tools to enhance meaningful learning. Knowledge Cartography, 24–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-149-7_2
Chapman, M. (1999). Constructivism and the problem reality. Journal of Applied Development Psychology, 20, 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973(99)90002-1
Article
Google Scholar
Cheung, D. (2015). Secondary school students’ chemistry self-efficacy: its importance, measurements, and sources. In Affective Dimensions in Chemistry Education. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45085-7_10
Čipková, E., Karolčík, Š., & Scholzová, L. (2019). Are secondary school graduates prepared for the studies of natural sciences? – evaluation and analysis of the result of scientific literacy levels achieved by secondary school graduates. Research in Science & Technological Education, 38(2), 146–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1599846.
Čipková, E., Karolcík, S., & Scholzová, L. (2020). Are secondary school graduates prepared for the studies of natural sciences? Evaluation and analysis of the result of scientific literacy levels achieved by secondary school graduates. Research in Science & Technological Education, 38(2), 146–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1599846
Article
Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston: Pearson Education INC.
Google Scholar
Cukurova, M., Bennett, J., & Abrahams, I. (2018). Students’ knowledge acquisition and ability to apply knowledge into different science contexts in two different independent learning settings. Research in Science & Technological Education, 36(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1336709
Article
Google Scholar
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Development Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Article
Google Scholar
Davies, M., Delvin, M. (2010). Chapter 1 interdisciplinary higher education. In Davies, M., Devlin, M.. & Tight. M. (Eds.). Interdisciplinary higher education: Perspectives and practicalities (International perspectives on higher education research) 5, 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-3628(2010)0000005004
DeKorver, B. K., & Towns, M. H. (2015). General chemistry students goals for chemistry laboratory coursework. Journal of Chemistry Education, 90(12), 2031–2037. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00463
Article
Google Scholar
Dhindsa, H. S., Makarimi-Kasim, A., & Anderson, O. R. (2010). Constructivist-visual mind map teaching approach and the quality of students’ cognitive structures. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 186–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9245-4
Article
Google Scholar
Duncan, R.G., Krajcik, J.S., & Rivet, A.E. (2016). Disciplinary core ideas: Reshaping teaching and learning. National Science Teachers Association Press.
Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2006). The anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic why the adjustments are insufficient. Psychological Science, 17(4), 311–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01704.x
Article
Google Scholar
Estonian Government. (2011). National Curriculum for Gymnasium. Regulation of the Government of the Republic of Estonia, Tallinn. Available from: http://www.riigitetaja.ee/akt/174787.
Fischer, E., & Hänze, M. (2020). How do university teachers’ values and beliefs affect their teaching? An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 40(3), 296–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1675867
Article
Google Scholar
Freedman, S. W. (1994). Exchanging writing, exchanging cultures. Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Ghufron, M. A., & Ermawati, S. (2018). The Strengths and Weaknesses of Cooperative Learning and Problembased Learning in EFL Writing Class: Teachers and Students’ Perspectives. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 657–672.
Harlen, W., Devés, R., Garza, G.F., Léna, P., Millar, R., Reiss, M., Rowell, P., & Yu, W. (2015). Working with Big Ideas of Science Education. Published by the Science Education Programme (SEP) of IAP.
Heddy, B. C., Sinatra, G. M., Seli, H., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Mukhopadhyay, A. (2017). Making learning meaningful: facilitating interest development and transfer in at-risk college students. An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 37(5), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2016.1150420
Article
Google Scholar
Holley, D., & Park, S. (2020). Integration of science disciplinary core ideas and environmental themes through constructivist teaching practices. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(5). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/115583
Houwer, J. D., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Moors, A. (2013). What is learning? On the nature and merits of a functional definition of learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 20, 631–642. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0386-3
Article
Google Scholar
Howell, G., S., Akpanudo, U., Chen, M., Sutherlin, A., L., & James, L., E. (2014). The effect on structured divergent prompts on knowledge construction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 18(2), 2014. https://doi.org/10.24069/olj.v18i2.410
Jamil, N., & Mahmud, S. (2019). Self-efficacy relationship on science achievement among national secondary school students. Creative Education, 10, 2509–2527. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1011179
Article
Google Scholar
Jena, A. K. (2012). Does constructivist approach applicable through concept maps to achieve meaningful learning in science? Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 13(1), 1–23.
Google Scholar
Jonassen, D. H., Howland, J., & Marra, R. M. (2003). Learning to solve problems with technology: A constructivist perspective (2nd ed.). Merrill/Prentice-Hall.
Google Scholar
Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2004). Measuring knowledge to optimize cognitive load factors during instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 558–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.558
Article
Google Scholar
Kober, N. (2015). Researching students: what research says about effective instruction in undergraduate science and engineering. Board on Science education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington: National Academies Press.
Google Scholar
Krajcik, J., & Delen, I. (2017). Engaging learners in STEM education. Estonian Journal of Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2017.5.1.02b
Kubsch, M., Touitou, I., Nordine, J., Fortus, D., Neumann, K., & Krajcik, J. (2020). Transferring knowledge in a knowledge-in-use task investigating the role of knowledge organization. Education Sciences, 10(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10010020
Article
Google Scholar
Lee, S. W. Y., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2016). Do sophisticated epistemic beliefs predict meaningful learning? Findings from a structural equation model of undergraduate biology learning. International Journal of Science Education, 38(15), 2327–2345. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1240384
Article
Google Scholar
Lewis, T. F. (2017). Evidence regarding the internal structure: Confirmatory factor analysis. Measurement and Evaluation Ins Counselling and Development, 50(4), 239–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1336929
Article
Google Scholar
Lin, T. J. (2021). Multi-dimensional explorations into the relationships between high school students’ science learning self-efficacy and engagement. International Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1904523
Article
Google Scholar
Linn, M. C. (2006). The knowledge integration perspective on learning and instruction. In R. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Mayer, R. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 226–232.
Article
Google Scholar
Mayer, R., Bove, W., Bryman, A., Mars, R., & Tapangco, L. (1996). When less is more: Meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of science textbook lessons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.88.1.64
Article
Google Scholar
Merriam, S. B., & Clark, M. C. (1993). Learning from life experience: What makes it significant? International Journal of Lifelong Education, 12(2), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260137930120205
Article
Google Scholar
Mowafaq, Q., Schechter, C., & Daas, R. (2019). Instructional leadership and teacher’s intent to leave: The mediating role of collective teacher efficacy and shared vision. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143219836683
Article
Google Scholar
Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B.O. (1998–2015). MPlus User’s Guide. 7th edn. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén and Muthén.
Mystakidis, S. (2019). Motivation enhanced deep and meaningful learning with social virtual reality. Finland: University of Jyväskylä.
Google Scholar
Nordine, J., Fortus, D., Lehavi, Y., Neumann, K., & Krajcik, J. (2019). Modelling energy transfers between systems to support energy knowledge use. Studies in Science Education, 177–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2018.1598048
Novak, J. D. (2002). Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate propositional hierarchies leading to empowerment of learners. Science Education, 86(4), 548–571. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10032
Article
Google Scholar
Novak, J. D. (2010). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations (2nd ed.). Routledge: Taylor-Francis.
Book
Google Scholar
Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Novak, K. D. (1993). Human constructivism: A unification of psychological and epistemological phenomena in meaning making. International Journal of Personal Construct Psychology, 6(2), 167–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/08936039308404338
Article
Google Scholar
NRC. (2012). Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. www.nap.edu
Odden, T. O. B., & Russ, R. S. (2019). Defining sensemaking: Bringing clarity to a fragmented theoretical construct. Science Education, 103(1), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1003/sce.21452
Article
Google Scholar
OECD (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage.
Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1972). Intellectual evolution from adolescence to adulthood. Human Development, 15(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1159/000271225
Article
Google Scholar
Pleasants, J., Tank, K. M., & Olson, J. (2021). Conceptual connections between science and engineering in elementary teachers’ unit plans. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(16), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00274-3
Article
Google Scholar
Schleicher, A. (2020). The Case for 21st-Century Learning. http://www.oecd.org/general/thecasefor21st-centurylearning.htm
Scott, P. (2017). Undisciplining knowledge: Interdisciplinarity in the Twentieth Century. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 391–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2016.1248676
Semilarski, H., Soobard, R., Semilarski, H., Laius, A., & Rannikmäe, M. (2020). Using genetic variation as and disciplinary core idea in science education. In: Gómez Chova, L., López Martínez, A. L., Candel Torres, I. (Ed.). INTED2020 Proceedings (5423−5429). Valencia, Spain: IATED Academy.
Semilarski, H., Laius, A., & Rannikmäe, M. (2019a). Development of Estonian upper secondary school students’ biological conceptual understanding and competence. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(6), 955–970. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/19.18.955
Article
Google Scholar
Semilarski, H., Soobard, R., Holbrook, J., & Rannikmäe, M. (2021b). Exploring the complexity of student-created mind maps, based on science-related disciplinary and interdisciplinary core ideas. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 17(1), e2227. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/9153
Article
Google Scholar
Semilarski, H., Soobard, R., & Rannikmäe, M. (2019b). Modeling students’ perceived self-efficacy and importance towards core ideas and work and life skills in science education. Science Education International, 30(4), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v30.i4.3
Article
Google Scholar
Semilarski, H., Soobard, R., & Rannikmäe, M. (2021a). Promoting students perceived self-efficacy towards 21st century skills through everyday life-related scenarios. Education Sciences, 11(10), 570. https://doi.org/10.33990/educsci11100570
Article
Google Scholar
Shen, J., Sung, S., & Zhang, D. M. (2016). Toward an analytical framework of interdisciplinary reasoning and communication (IRC) processes in science. International Journal of Science Education, 37(17), 2809–2835. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1106026
Article
Google Scholar
Smit, R., Hess, K., Bachmann, P., Blum, V., & Birri, T. (2019). What happens after the intervention? Results from teacher professional development in employing mathematical reasoning tasks and a supporting rubric. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00113
Article
Google Scholar
Soobard, R., Semilarski, H., Holbrook, J., & Rannikmäe, M. (2018). Grade 12 students’ perceived self-efficacy towards working life skills and curriculum content promoted through science education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(5), 838–850. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/18.17.838
Article
Google Scholar
Stuckey, M., Hofstein, A., Malmok-Naaman, R., & Eilks, I. (2013). The meaning of ‘relevance’ in science education and its implications for the science curriculum. Studies in Scinece Education, 49(1), 1–34.
Sukhov, A., Antti, S., Lars, O., Peter, M. (2018). That makes sense to me: openness to change and sensemaking in idea screening. International Journal of Innovation Management, 22(8).
Tasker, R. (1992). Effective teaching: What can a constructivist view of learning offer. The Australian Science Teacher Journal, 38, 25–34.
Google Scholar
Thompson, P. (2000). Radical constructivism: Reflections and directions. In L. P. Steffe & P. Thompson (Eds.), Radical constructivism in action: Building on the pioneering work of Ernst von Glaserfield (pp. 412–448). London: Flamer Press.
Google Scholar
Van Laar, E., Van Deursen, A. J., Van Dijk, J. A., & De Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behaviour, 72, 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010
Article
Google Scholar
Vincent-Lancrin, S., Urgel, J., Kar, S., & Jacotin, G. (2019). Measuring innovation in education 2019: What has changed in the classroom? OECD Publishing.
Book
Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Weick, K., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783038212843.216
Article
Google Scholar
White, R. (2001). The revolution in research on science teaching. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 457–471). American Educational Research Association.
Google Scholar
Wilson, S. T. (2001). Research on history teaching. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 527–544). American Educational Research Association.
Google Scholar
Wu, F., & Fan, W. (2017). Academic procrastination in linking motivation and achievement-related behaviours: A perspective of expectancy-value theory. Educational Psychology, 37(6), 695–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2016.1202901
Article
Google Scholar
Zang, P., & Soergel, D. (2014). Towards a comprehensive model of the cognitive process and mechanisms of individual sensemaking. JASIST, 65(9), 1733–1756. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23125
Article
Google Scholar
Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Beck, K., Fischer, J., Braunheim, D., Schmidt, S., & Shavelson, R. (2020). The role of students’ beliefs when critically reasoning from multiple contradictory sources of information in performance assessment. Frontiers in Psychology, 22, 2192. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02192
Article
Google Scholar