Adams W.K., Wieman C. E., Perkins K. K., and Barbera, J. (2008). Modifying and validating the Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey for use in chemistry. Journal of Chemistry Education, 85(10), 1435.
Allensworth, E. M., & Clark, K. (2020). High school GPAs and ACT scores as predictors of college completion: Examining assumptions about consistency across high schools. Educational Researcher, 49(3), 198–211.
Aycock, L. M., Hazari, Z., Brewe, E., Clancy, K. B., Hodapp, T., & Goertzen, R. M. (2019). Sexual harassment reported by undergraduate female physicists. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(1), 010121.
Bauer, C. F. (2005). Beyond “student attitudes”: Chemistry self-concept inventory for assessment of the affective component of student learning. Journal of Chemistry Education, 82(12), 1864.
Beilock, S. L., Kulp, C. A., Holt, L. E., & Carr, T. H. (2004). More on the fragility of performance: Choking under pressure in mathematical problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(4), 584.
Bernal, P., Mittag, N., & Qureshi, J. A. (2016). Estimating effects of school quality using multiple proxies. Labour Economics, 39, 1–10.
Betancur, L., Rottman, B. M., Votruba-Drzal, E., & Schunn, C. D. (2019). Analytical assessment of course sequencing: The case of methodological courses in psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(1), 91–103.
Betancur, L., Votruba-Drzal, E., & Schunn, C. D. (2018). Socioeconomic gaps in science achievement. International Journal of STEM Education, 5, 38.
Boyer Commission (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: a blueprint for America’s research universities.
Brown, K. S., Kijakazi, K., Runes, C., & Turner, M. A. (2019). Confronting structural racism in research and policy analysis. Urban Institute https://www.urban.org/research/publication/confronting-structural-racism-research-and-policy-analysis.
Canning, E. A., Muenks, K., Green, D. J., & Murphy, M. C. (2019). STEM faculty who believe ability is fixed have larger racial achievement gaps and inspire less student motivation in their classes. Science Advances, 5, eaau4734.
Chen, S., Binning, K. R., Manke, K. J., Brady, S. T., McGreevy, E. M., Betancur, L., … Kaufmann, N. (2020). Am I a science person? A strong science identity bolsters minority students’ sense of belonging and performance in college. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1–14.
College Board (2016). 2016 college-bound seniors total group profile report. https://secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/sat/total-group-2016.pdf
College Board. (2018a). Program summary report. https://secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/research/2018/Program-Summary-Report-2018.pdf
College Board. (2018b). Guide to the ACT®/SAT® concordance. https://collegereadiness.collegeboard.org/educators/higher-ed/scoring/concordance
Conley, D. T. (2003). Understanding university success. A report from standards for success. Center for Educational Policy Research.
Conley, D. T. (2007). Redefining college readiness. Educational Policy Improvement Center.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Self-determination theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 416–436). Sage Publications Ltd.
Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task value and the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices, (pp. 105–121). Handbook of Competence Motivation.
Enders, C. K., & Bandalos, D. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 8(3), 430–457.
Fencl, H., & Scheel, K. (2005). Engaging students. Journal of College Science Teaching, 35(1), 20–24.
Fortin, N. M., Oreopoulos, P., & Phipps, S. (2015). Leaving boys behind gender disparities in high academic achievement. Journal of Human Resources, 50(3), 549–579.
Geiser, S., & Santelices, M. V. (2007). Validity of high-school grades in predicting student success beyond the freshman year: High-school record vs. standardized tests as indicators of four-year college outcomes. UC Berkeley Research and Occasional Paper Series https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7306z0zf.
González, A., & Paoloni, P. V. (2015). Perceived autonomy-support, expectancy, value, metacognitive strategies and performance in chemistry: a structural equation model in undergraduates. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(3), 640–653.
Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2017). School resources and student achievement: A review of cross-country economic research. In M. Rosén, K. Yang Hansen, & U. Wolff (Eds.), Cognitive Abilities and Educational Outcomes, (pp. 149–171). Springer.
Harackiewicz, J. M., & Priniski, S. J. (2018). Improving student outcomes in higher education: the science of targeted intervention. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 409–435.
Hazari, Z., Tai, R. H., & Sadler, P. M. (2007). Gender differences in introductory university physics performance: the influence of high school physics preparation and affective factors. Science Education, 91(6), 847–876.
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127.
Honicke, T., & Broadbent, J. (2016). The influence of academic self-efficacy on academic performance: a systematic review. Educational Research Review, 17, 63–84.
Hsieh, T. L. (2014). Motivation matters? The relationship among different types of learning motivation, engagement behaviors and learning outcomes of undergraduate students in Taiwan. Higher Education, 68(3), 417–433.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
Hulleman, C. S., Godes, O., Hendricks, B. L., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). Enhancing interest and performance with a utility value intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 880–895.
Hyde, J. S., Bigler, R. S., Joel, D., Tate, C. C., & van Anders, S. M. (2019). The future of sex and gender in psychology: five challenges to the gender binary. American Psychologist, 74(2), 171.
Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS); (2019). University of Pittsburgh-Pittsburgh Campus. https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/datacenter/institutionprofile.aspx?unitId=215293
Johnson, A. C. (2007). Unintended consequences: How science professors discourage women of color. Science Education, 91(5), 805–821.
Kalender, Z. Y., Marshman, E., Schunn, C., Nokes-Malach, T., & Singh, C. (2020). Damage caused by women’s lower self-efficacy on physics learning. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(1).
Keith, T. (2006). Multiple regression and beyond. Pearson Education.
Komarraju, M., & Nadler, D. (2013). Self-efficacy and academic achievement: why do implicit beliefs, goals, and effort regulation matter? Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 67–72.
Kurban, E. R., & Cabrera, A. F. (2019). Building readiness and intention towards STEM fields of study: using HSLS: 09 and SEM to examine this complex process among high school students. The Journal of Higher Education, 1–31.
Lawson, A. E., Banks, D. L., & Logvin, M. (2007). Self-efficacy, reasoning ability, and achievement in college biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(5), 706–741.
Le, H., Robbins, S. B., & Westrick, P. (2014). Predicting student enrollment and persistence in college STEM fields using an expanded PE fit framework: A large-scale multilevel study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(5), 915–947.
Leslie, S., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M., & Freeland, E. (2015). Women are underrepresented in disciplines that emphasize brilliance as the key to success. Science, 347, 262–265.
Li, S. D. (2011). Testing mediation using multiple regression and structural equation modeling analyses in secondary data. Evaluation Review, 35(3), 240–268.
Lopez, F. G., & Lent, R. W. (1992). Sources of mathematics self-efficacy in high school students. The Career Development Quarterly, 41(1), 3–12.
Luschei, T. F., & Jeong, D. W. (2018). Is teacher sorting a global phenomenon? Cross-national evidence on the nature and correlates of teacher quality opportunity gaps. Educational Researcher, 47(9), 556–576.
Magalhães, P., Ferreira, D., Cunha, J., & Rosário, P. (2020). Online vs traditional homework: a systematic review on the benefits to students’ performance. Computers & Education, 103869.
Marchand, G. C., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2013). Stereotype threat and women’s performance in physics. International Journal of Science Education, 35(18), 3050–3061.
Marshman, E., Kalender, Z. Y., Schunn, C. D., Nokes-Malach, T., & Singh, C. (2018b). A longitudinal analysis of students’ motivational characteristics in introductory physics courses: Gender differences. Canadian Journal of Physics, 96, 391–405.
Marshman, E. M., Kalender, Z. Y., Nokes-Malach, T., Schunn, C., & Singh, C. (2018a). Female students with A’s have similar physics self-efficacy as male students with C’s in introductory courses: a cause for alarm? Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(2).
Matz, R. L., Koester, B. P., Fiorini, S., Grom, G., Shepard, L., Stangor, C. G., … McKay, T. A. (2017). Patterns of gendered performance differences in large introductory courses at five research universities. AERA Open, 3(4).
Miyake, A., Kost-Smith, L. E., Finkelstein, N. D., Pollock, S. J., Cohen, G. L., & Ito, T. A. (2010). Reducing the gender achievement gap in college science: A classroom study of values affirmation. Science, 330(6008), 1234–1237.
Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(41), 16474–16479.
National Research Council (2002). Learning and understanding: Improving advanced study of mathematics and science in U.S. high schools. National Academies Press.
National Science Board. (2018). Science & Engineering Indicators 2018 (NSB-2018-1). https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/report/
National Survey of Student Engagement. (2006). Engaged learning: Fostering success for all students.
Nissen, J. M., & Shemwell, J. T. (2016). Gender, experience, and self-efficacy in introductory physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2).
Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079.
Page, L. C., Kehoe, S. S., Castleman, B. L., & Sahadewo, G. A. (2019). More than dollars for scholars: The impact of the Dell Scholars Program on college access, persistence, and degree attainment. Journal of Human Resources, 54(3), 683-725.
Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research (Vol. 2). Jossey-Bass.
Putnam, A. L., Sungkhasettee, V. W., & Roediger, H. L. (2016). Optimizing learning in college: Tips from cognitive psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(5), 652-660.
Putnam, R. D. (2016). Our kids: The American dream in crisis. Simon and Schuster.
Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., & Carlstrom, A. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130(2), 261-288.
Robinson, M. (2003). Student enrollment in high school AP sciences and calculus: How does it correlate with STEM careers? Bulletin of Science, Technology, Society, 23(4), 265-273.
Royston, P. (2004). Multiple imputation of missing values. The Stata Journal, 4, 227–241.
Royston, P. (2005). Multiple imputation of missing values: Update of ICE. The Stata Journal, 5, 527–536.
Sadler, P. M., & Tai, R. H. (2001). Success in introductory college physics: The role of high school preparation. Science Education, 85(2), 111-136.
Sadler, P. M., & Tai, R. H. (2007a). Transitions - The two high-school pillars supporting college science. Science, 317(5837), 457-458.
Sadler, P. M., & Tai, R. H. (2007b). Weighting for recognition: Accounting for advanced placement and honors courses when calculating high school grade point average. NASSP Bulletin, 91(1), 5-32.
Salehi, S., Burkholder, E., LePage, G. P., Pollock, S., & Wieman, C. (2019). The impact of incoming preparation and demographics on performance in Physics I: A multi-institution comparison. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.00389.
Sawyer, R. (2013). Beyond correlations: Usefulness of high school GPA and test scores in making college admissions decisions. Applied Measurement in Education, 26(2), 89-112.
Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2002). The development of academic self-efficacy. In Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (Eds.), Development of Achievement Motivation (pp. 15-31). Academic Press.
Sen, M., & Wasow, O. (2016). Race as a bundle of sticks: Designs that estimate effects of seemingly immutable characteristics. Annual Review of Political Science, 19, 499-522.
Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences (Vol. 12). Westview Press.
Sobel, M. E. (1987). Direct and indirect effects in linear structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research, 16, 155–176.
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811.
Taasoobshirazi, G., Puckett, C., & Marchand, G. (2019). Stereotype threat and gender differences in biology. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(7), 1267-1282.
Talsma, K., Schüz, B., Schwarzer, R., & Norris, K. (2018). I believe, therefore I achieve (and vice versa): A meta-analytic cross-lagged panel analysis of self-efficacy and academic performance. Learning & Individual Differences, 61, 136-150.
Tyson, W., Lee, R., Borman, K. M., & Hanson, M. A. (2007). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) pathways: High school science and math coursework and postsecondary degree attainment. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 12(3), 243-270.
University of Pittsburgh (2019). Fact Book, 2019. https://catalog.upp.pitt.edu/mime/media/view/170/15158/Fact-Book-2019.pdf.
Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41(1), 19-31.
Vincent-Ruz, P., Binning, K., Schunn, C. D., & Grabowski, J. (2018). The effect of math SAT on women’s chemistry competency beliefs. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(1), 342-351.
Vincent-Ruz, P., & Schunn, C. D. (2017). The increasingly important role of science competency beliefs for science learning in girls. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(6), 790–822.
Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2011). A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes of minority students. Science, 331(6023), 1447-1451.
Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J. L. (2017). Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): Current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Education Psychology Review, 29(1), 119-140.
Wang, M.-T., Eccles, J. S., & Kenny, S. (2013). Not lack of ability but more choice: Individual and gender differences in choice of careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Psychological Science, 24(5), 770-775.
Warne, R. T., Nagaishi, C., Slade, M. K., Hermesmeyer, P., & Peck, E. K. (2014). Comparing weighted and unweighted grade point averages in predicting college success of diverse and low-income college students. NASSP Bulletin, 98(4), 261-279.
Whitcomb, K. M., Kalender, Z. Y., Nokes-Malach, T. J., Schunn, C. D., & Singh, C. (2020). A mismatch between self-efficacy and performance: Undergraduate women in engineering tend to have lower self-efficacy despite earning higher grades than men. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.06006.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology. Special Issue: Motivation and the Educational Process, 25(1), 68-81.
Witherspoon, E. B., Vincent-Ruz, P., & Schunn, C. D. (2019). When making the grade isn’t enough: The gendered nature of premed science course attrition. Educational Researcher, 48(4), 193-204.