Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (2001). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, Engineering Accreditation Commission of the Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology. Available on-line at http://www.abet.org/criteria.html.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (2019). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. Retrieved from https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/accreditation-policy-and-procedure-manual-appm-2019-2020/
Baldinger, E. E., Staats, S., Covington-Clarkson, L. M., Gullickson, E., Norman, F., & Akoto, B. (2021). Returning voice to the silent M: A review of conceptions of mathematics in integrated STEM Education. In J. Anderson, & Y. Li (Eds.), Integrated Approaches to STEM Education: An International Perspective.
Beane, J. (1995). Curriculum integration and the disciplines of knowledge. The Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 616–622.
Becker, K., & Park, K. (2011). Effects of integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students’ learning: A preliminary meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education, 12(5), 23–38.
Berlin, D. F., & White, A. L. (1995). Connecting school science and mathematics. In P. A. House, & A. F. Coxford (Eds.), Connecting mathematics across the curriculum. 1995 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Yearbook, (pp. 22–33). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Bintz, J. (2009). How to select program for you inquiry classrooms in The Biology Teachers Handbook, (4th ed., ). Arlington: National Science Teachers Association.
Brooks, G. J., & Brooks, G. M. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivism classroom. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in P-12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 369–387.
Bryan, L. A., Moore, T. J., Johnson, C. C., & Roehrig, G. H. (2016). Integrated STEM education. In C. C. Johnson, E. E. Peters-Burton, & T. J. Moore (Eds.), STEM Road Map: STEM Road Map: A framework for integrated STEM education. New York: Routledge.
Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: a 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30–35.
Bybee, R. W. (2013). A case for STEM education. Arlington: National Science Teachers’ Association Press.
Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in problem solving, (vol. 1). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cira, N. J., Chung, A. M., Denisin, A. K., Rensi, S., Sanchez, G. N., Quake, S. R., & Riedel-Kruse, I. H. (2015). A biotic game design project for integrated life science and engineering education. PLoS Biology, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002110.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education. New York: Routledge.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research, (4th ed., ). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Crotty, E. A., Guzey, S. S., Roehrig, G. H., Glancy, A. W., Ring-Whalen, E. A., & Moore, T. J. (2017). Approaches to integrating engineering in STEM units and student achievement gains. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 7(2), 1–14.
Cunningham, C. M., & Carlsen, W. S. (2014). Teaching engineering practices. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25, 197–210.
Czerniak, C. M., Weber, W. B., Sandmann, J. A., & Ahern, J. (1999). Literature review of science and mathematics integration. School Science and Mathematics, 99(8), 421–430.
Dare, E. A., Ellis, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2014). Driven by beliefs: understanding challenges physical science teachers face when integrating engineering and physics. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 4(2), 1–13.
Davison, D. M., Miller, K. W., & Metheny, D. L. (1995). What does integration of science and mathematics really mean? School Science and Mathematics, 95(5), 226–230.
DeBoer, G. E. (2014). The history of science curriculum reform in the United States. In N. Lederman, & S. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education, (vol. 2, pp. 759–578). New York and London: Routledge.
Douglas, J., Iversen, E., & Kalyandurg, C. (2004). Engineering in the K-12 classroom: An analysis of current practices & guidelines for the future. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
Drake, S. M. (1991). How our team dissolved the boundaries. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 20–22.
Drake, S. M. (1998). Creating integrated curriculum: Proven ways to increase student learning. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
Dym, C. (1999). Learning engineering: Design, languages, and experiences. Journal of Engineering Education, 88(2), 145–148.
English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K–12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1.
Fogarty, R. (1991). Ten ways to integrate the curriculum. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 61–65.
Guzey, S. S., Harwell, M., Moreno, M., Peralta, Y., & Moore, T. J. (2017). The impact of design-based STEM integration curricula on student achievement in engineering, science, and mathematics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26, 207–222.
Guzey, S. S., Moore, T. J., & Harwell, M. (2016). Building Up STEM: An analysis of teacher-developed engineering design-based STEM integration curricular materials. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 6(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1129.
Guzey, S. S., Ring-Whalen, E. A., Harwell, M., & Peralta, Y. (2019). Life STEM: A case study of life science learning through engineering design. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17, 23–42.
Han, S., Capraro, R., & Capraro, M. M. (2015). How science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (stem) project-based learning (pbl) affects high, middle, and low achievers differently: The impact of student factors on achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(5), 1089–1113.
Harwell, M., Moreno, M., Phillips, A., Guzey, S. S., Moore, T. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2015). A study of STEM assessments in engineering, science, and mathematics for elementary and middle school students. School Science and Mathematics, 115(2), 66–74.
Hirst, P. H. (1974). Knowledge and the curriculum: A collection of philosophical papers. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Hmelo, C., Douglas, H., & Kolodner, J. (2000). Designing to learn complex systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 247–298.
Hoachlander, G., & Yanofsky, D. (2011). Making STEM real: By infusing core academics with rigorous real-world work, linked learning pathways prepare students for both college and career. Educational Leadership, 68(3), 60–65.
Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, A. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Washington: National Academies Press.
Huntley, M. A. (1998). Design and implementation of a framework for defining integrated mathematics and science education. School Science and Mathematics, 98(6), 320–327.
Hurley, M. M. (2001). Reviewing Integrated science and mathematics: The search for evidence and definitions from new perspectives. School Science and Mathematics, 101(5), 259–268.
Jacobs, H. H. (1989). Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z.
Lederman, N. G., & Niess, M. L. (1997). Integrated, interdisciplinary, or thematic instruction? Is this a question or is it questionable semantics? School Science and Mathematics, 97(2), 57–58.
Lee, O., Quinn, H., & Valdes, G. (2013). Science and language for English language learners in relation to Next Generation Science Standards and with implications for Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Mathematics. Educational Researcher, 42(4), 223–233.
Li, Y., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2019). Problematizing teaching and learning mathematics as “given” in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(44). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0197-9.
McFadden, J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2020). Missed expectations: Teacher and coach tensions at the boundary of STEM integration in an elementary classroom. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-020-00021-8.
Mehalik, M. M., Doppelt, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Middle-school science through design-based learning versus scripted inquiry: Better overall science concept learning and equity gap reduction. Journal of Engineering Education, 97, 71–85.
Mintzes, J., Wandersee, J., & Novak, J. (2000). Assessing science understanding: A human constructivist view. Orlando: Academic Press.
Monk, M., & Osborne, J. (2000). Good practice in science teaching: What research has to say. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Moore, D. S., & Cobb, G. W. (2000). Statistics and mathematics: Tension and cooperation. The American Mathematical Monthly, 107(7), 615–630.
Moore, T. J., Glancy, A. W., Tank, K. M., Kersten, J. A., & Smith, K. A. (2014). A framework for quality K-12 engineering education: Research and development. Journal of Pre-college Engineering Education Research, 4(1), 1–13.
Moore, T. J., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Advancing the state of the art of STEM integration. Journal of STEM Education, 15(1), 5–10.
Moore, T. J., Stohlmann, M. S., Wang, H.-H., Tank, K. M., & Roehrig, G. H. (2014). Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education. In J. Strobel, S. Purzer, & M. Cardella (Eds.), Engineering in pre-college settings: Research into practice. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Moore, T. J., Tank, K. M., Glancy, A. M., & Kersten, J. A. (2015). NGSS and the landscape of engineering in K-12 state science standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(3), 296–318.
National Academy of Engineering. (2010). Standards for K-12 engineering education? Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Academy of Science, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington D.C.: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Research Council (2012). A framework for K-12 science education practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. In Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards, Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Science and Education. Washington D.C.: The National Academies Press.
National Science Board, Commission on Precollege Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology (1983). Educating Americans for the 21st Century: A plan of action for improving mathematics, science and technology education for all American elementary and secondary students. Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation.
NGSS Lead States (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Powell, J. C., & Anderson, R. (2002). Changing teachers’ practice: curriculum materials and science education reform in the USA. Studies in Science Education, 37, 107–135.
Quinn, F. (2012). A revolution in mathematics? What really happened a century ago and why it matters today. Notices of the AMS, 59(1), 31–37.
Resnick, L. B. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Reynante, B. M., Selbach-Allen, M. E., & Pimentel, D. R. (2020). Exploring the promises and perils of integrated STEM, through disciplinary practices and epistemologies. Science & Education. Published online. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00121-x.
Ring, E. A., Dare, E. A., Crotty, E. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2017). The evolution of teacher conceptions of STEM education throughout an intensive professional development experience. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(5), 444–467.
Roehrig, G. H., & Dewey, J. (2021). STEM integration in middle school life science. In Paper to be presented at the 6th International STEM in Education Conference, Vancouver, CA.
Roth, K. J., Druker, S. L., Garnier, H. E., Lemmens, M., Chen, C., Kawanaka, T., … Gallimore, R. (2006). Teaching science in five countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study (NCES 2006-011). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Sadler, P., Coyle, H., & Schwartz, M. (2000). Engineering competitions in the middle school classroom: Key elements in developing effective design challenges. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 299–327.
Sanders, M. E. (2009). STEM, STEMeducation, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20–26.
Sheppard, S. D., Macantangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2009). Educating engineers: Designing for the future of the field. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Silk, E. M., Higashi, R., Shoop, R., & Schunn, C. D. (2010). Designing technology activities that teach mathematics. The Technology Teacher, 69(4), 21–27.
Siregar, N. C., Rosli, R., Maat, S. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2020). The effect of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) program on students’ achievement in mathematics: A meta-analysis. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(1), Article No: em0549.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Toulmin, C., & Groome, M. (2007). Building a science, technology, engineering and math agenda. Washington, DC: National Governors Association.
Vasquez, J., Sneider, C., & Comer, M. (2013). STEM lesson essentials, grades 3–8: integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Walker, W. S. (2017). Integrated STEm or integrated STEM? School Science and Mathematics, 117(6), 225–227.
Walker, W. S., Guzey, S. S., Moore, T. J., & Sorge, B. H. (2018). Frameworks to develop integrated STEM curricula. K-12 STEM Education, 4(2), 331–339.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods, (5th ed., ). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishing.
Zhang, D., Orrill, C., & Campbell, T. (2015). Using the mixture Rasch model to explore knowledge resources students invoke in mathematic and science assessments. School Science and Mathematics, 115(7), 356–365.