Aronson, J., Fried, C. B., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1491
Bagès, C., Verniers, C., & Martinot, D. (2016). Virtues of a hardworking role model to improve girls’ mathematics performance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315608842
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
Bandura, A. (2012). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38(1), 9–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410606
Bian, L., Leslie, S. J., & Cimpian, A. (2017). Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests. Science, 355(6323), 389–391. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah6524
Binning, K., Kaufmann, N., McGreevy, E., Fotuhi, O., Chen, S., Marshman, E., Kalender, Z., Limeri, L., Betancur, L., & Singh, C. (2020). Changing social contexts to foster equity in college science courses: An ecological-belonging intervention. Psychological Science, 31(9), 1059–1070. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620929984
Blackwell, L., Trzesniewski, K., & Dweck, C. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x
Bleeker, M., & Jacobs, J. (2004). Achievement in math and science: Do mothers’ beliefs matter 12 years later? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0618.104.22.168
Bouffard-Bouchard, T., Parent, S., & Larivée, S. (1991). Influence of self-efficacy on self-regulation and performance among junior and senior high-school age children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 14(2), 153.
Browne, M., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005
Canning, E., Muenks, K., Green, D., & Murphy, M. (2019). STEM faculty who believe ability is fixed have larger racial achievement gaps and inspire less student motivation in their classes. Science Advances. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau4734
Cavallo, A., Potter, W., & Rozman, M. (2004). Gender differences in learning constructs, shifts in learning constructs, and their relationship to course achievement in a structured inquiry, yearlong college physics course for life science majors. School Science and Mathematics, 104(6), 288–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2004.tb18000.x
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). L. Erlbaum Associates.
Cook, D. A., Castillo, R. M., Gas, B., & Artino, A. R., Jr. (2017). Measuring achievement goal motivation, mindsets and cognitive load: Validation of three instruments’ scores. Medical Education, 51(10), 1061–1074. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13405
Crisp, G., Nora, A., & Taggart, A. (2009). Student characteristics, pre-college, college, and environmental factors as predictors of majoring in and earning a STEM degree: An analysis of students attending a Hispanic serving institution. American Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 924–942. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209349460
Cwik, S., & Singh, C. (2021). How perception of learning environment predicts male and female students’ grades and motivational outcomes in algebra-based introductory physics courses. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(2), 020143. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020143
De Castella, K., & Byrne, D. (2015). My intelligence may be more malleable than yours: The revised implicit theories of intelligence (self-theory) scale is a better predictor of achievement, motivation, and student disengagement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 30(3), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-015-0244-y
Deiglmayr, A., Stern, E., & Schubert, R. (2019). Beliefs in “brilliance” and belonging uncertainty in male and female STEM students. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1114. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01114
Denworth, L. (2019, August). Debate Arises over Teaching “Growth Mindsets” to Motivate Students. Scientific American. Retrieved from https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/debate-arises-over-teaching-growth-mindsets-to-motivate-students/#
Dweck, C. S. (2008). Mindsets and math/science achievement. Carnegie Corporation of New York. Retrieved from https://www.growthmindsetmaths.com/
Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success (1st ed.). Random House.
Dweck, C. (2007). Is math a gift? Beliefs that put females at risk. In S. J. Ceci & W. M. Williams (Eds.), Why aren’t more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 47–55). American Psychological Association.
Eaton, A., Saunders, J., Jacobson, R., & West, K. (2020). How gender and race stereotypes impact the advancement of scholars in STEM: Professors’ biased evaluations of physics and biology post-doctoral candidates. Sex Roles, 82(3–4), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01052-w
Felder, R., Felder, G., Mauney, M., Hamrin, C., Jr., & Dietz, E. (1995). A longitudinal study of engineering student performance and retention III Gender differences in student performance and attitudes. Journal of Engineering Education, 84(2), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1995.tb00162.x
Frey, B. (2018). The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. SAGE Publications.
Galla, B., Shulman, E., Plummer, B., Gardner, M., Hutt, S., Goyer, J., D’Mello, S., Finn, A., & Duckworth, A. (2019). Why high school grades are better predictors of on-time college graduation than are admissions test scores: The roles of self-regulation and cognitive ability. American Educational Research Journal, 56(6), 2077–2115. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219843292
Ganley, C., George, C., Cimpian, J., & Makowski, M. (2018). Gender equity in college majors: Looking beyond the STEM/non-STEM dichotomy for answers regarding female participation. American Educational Research Journal, 55(3), 453–487. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217740221
García-Cepero, M. C., & McCoach, D. B. (2009). Educators’ implicit theories of intelligence and beliefs about the identification of gifted students. Universitas Psychologica, 8(2), 295–310.
Gonzalez, H. B., & Kuenzi, J. J. (2012). Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education: A Primer (CRS Report No. R42530). Library of Congress Congressional Research Service.
Good, C., Aronson, J., & Inzlicht, M. (2003). Improving adolescents’ standardized test performance: An intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24(6), 645–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2003.09.002
Goodman, I. (2002). Final report of the women’s experiences in college engineering project (ED507394). ERIC. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED507394.pdf
Haak, D., Hillerislambers, J., Pitre, E., & Freeman, S. (2011). Increased structure and active learning reduce the achievement gap in introductory biology. Science, 332(6034), 1213–1216. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204820
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.
Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P., & Shanahan, M. (2010). Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 978–1003. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20363
Hazari, Z., Tai, R., & Sadler, P. (2007). Gender differences in introductory university physics performance: The influence of high school physics preparation and affective factors. Science Education, 91(6), 847–876. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20223
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS). (2020). University of Pittsburgh-Pittsburgh Campus. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/datacenter/institutionprofile.aspx?unitId=215293
Jacobs, J., & Eccles, J. (1992). The impact of mothers’ gender-role stereotypic beliefs on mothers’ and children’s ability perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(6), 932–944. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3522.214.171.1242
Kalender, Y. Z., Marshman, E., Schunn, C. D., Nokes-Malach, T. J., & Singh, C. (2022). Framework for unpacking gendered mindsets in physics by students' gender. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18, 010116. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.010116.
Kepple, C., Tilahun, M., Matti, N., & Coble, K. (2020). Pedagogy training for the development of GTA mindsets and inclusive teaching practices. In S. Wolf, M. B. Bennett, & B. W. Frank (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2020 Physics Education Research Conference (pp. 272–277). American Association of Physics Teachers. https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2020.pr.Kepple
Kline, R. B. (2016). Methodology in the social sciences. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
Kost, L., Pollock, S., & Finkelstein, N. (2009). Characterizing the gender gap in introductory physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 5(1), 010101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.5.010101
Kricorian, K., Seu, M., Lopez, D., Ureta, E., & Equils, O. (2020). Factors influencing participation of underrepresented students in STEM fields: Matched mentors and mindsets. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00219-2
LaCosse, J., Murphy, M. C., Garcia, J. A., & Zirkel, S. (2021). The role of STEM professors’ mindset beliefs on students’ anticipated psychological experiences and course interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(5), 949–971. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000620
Leslie, S., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M., & Freeland, E. (2015). Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science, 347(6219), 262–265. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261375
Limeri, L., Carter, N., Choe, J., Harper, H., Martin, H., Benton, A., & Dolan, E. (2020). Growing a growth mindset: Characterizing how and why undergraduate students’ mindsets change. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00227-2
Little, A., Humphrey, B., Green, A., Nair, A., & Sawtelle, V. (2019). Exploring mindset’s applicability to students’ experiences with challenge in transformed college physics courses. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(1), 010127. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.010127
Madsen, A., McKagan, S., & Sayre, E. (2013). Gender gap on concept inventories in physics: What is consistent, what is inconsistent, and what factors influence the gap? Physical Review Physics Education Research, 9(2), 020121. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.020121
Marshman, E., Kalender, Z., Nokes-Malach, T., Schunn, C., & Singh, C. (2018). Female students with A’s have similar physics self-efficacy as male students with C’s in introductory courses: A cause for alarm? Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(2), 020123. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.020123
Marshman, E., Kalender, Z., Schunn, C., Nokes-Malach, T., & Singh, C. (2017). A longitudinal analysis of students’ motivational characteristics in introductory physics courses: Gender differences. Canadian Journal of Physics, 96(4), 391–405. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjp-2017-0185
Miller, K., Schell, J., Ho, A., Lukoff, B., & Mazur, E. (2015). Response switching and self-efficacy in Peer Instruction classrooms. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 11(1), 010104. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.010104.
Moss-Racusin, C., Dovidio, J., Brescoll, V., Graham, M., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 16474.
Mueller, C., & Dweck, C. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35126.96.36.199
Muenks, K., & Miele, D. B. (2017). Students’ thinking about effort and ability: The role of developmental, contextual, and individual difference factors. Review of Educational Research, 87(4), 707–735. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316689328
National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2019). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2019 (Special Report NSF 19-304). National Science Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd.
Nissen, J., & Shemwell, J. (2016). Gender, experience, and self-efficacy in introductory physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020105. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020105
Pintrich, P., & De Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-06188.8.131.52
Porter, A. (2019). Women in Physics and Astronomy 2019. Statistical Research Center of the American Institute of Physics. Retrieved from https://www.aip.org/sites/default/files/statistics/women/Women%20in%20Physics%20and%20Astronomy%202019.1.pdf
Raelin, J., Bailey, M., Hamann, J., Pendleton, L., Reisberg, R., & Whitman, D. (2014). The gendered effect of cooperative education, contextual support, and self-efficacy on undergraduate retention. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(4), 599–624. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20060
Rattan, A., Good, C., & Dweck, C. (2012). “It’s ok—Not everyone can be good at math”: Instructors with an entity theory comfort (and demotivate) students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 731–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.012
Rattan, A., Savani, K., Chugh, D., & Dweck, C. S. (2015). Leveraging mindsets to promote academic achievement: Policy recommendations. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 10, 721–726. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615599383.
Rattan, A., Savani, K., Komarraju, M., Morrison, M. M., Boggs, C., & Ambady, N. (2018). Meta-lay theories of scientific potential drive underrepresented students’ sense of belonging to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(1), 54–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000130
Redish, E., Saul, J., & Steinberg, R. (1998). Student expectations in introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 66(3), 212–224. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18847
Sadler, P., & Tai, R. (2001). Success in introductory college physics: The role of high school preparation. Science Education, 85(2), 111–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200103)85:2%3c111::AID-SCE20%3e3.0.CO;2-O
Salehi, S., Burkholder, E., Lepage, G., Pollock, S., & Wieman, C. (2019). Demographic gaps or preparation gaps? The large impact of incoming preparation on performance of students in introductory physics. Physical Review. Physics Education Research, 15(2), 020114. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020114
Sawtelle, V., Brewe, E., & Kramer, L. (2012). Exploring the relationship between self-efficacy and retention in introductory physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(9), 1096–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21050
Scherr, R., Plisch, M., Gray, K., Potvin, G., & Hodapp, T. (2017). Fixed and growth mindsets in physics graduate admissions. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 020133. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020133
Schudson, Z. C. (2021). Psychology’s stewardship of gender/sex. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1105–1112. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211018462
Shih, S. (2011). Perfectionism, implicit theories of intelligence, and Taiwanese eighth-grade students’ academic engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 104(2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903570368
Sisk, V., Burgoyne, A., Sun, J., Butler, J., & Macnamara, B. (2018). To what extent and under which circumstances are growth mind-sets important to academic achievement? Two meta-analyses. Psychological Science, 29(4), 549–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617739704
StataCorp. (2021). Stata statistical software: Release 17. StataCorp LLC.
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-35184.108.40.2067
The College Board and ACT, Inc. (2018.) Guide to the 2018 ACT /SAT concordance. Retrieved from https://www.act.org/content/dam/act/unsecured/documents/ACT-SAT-Concordance-Information.pdf
Traxler, A., Cid, X., Blue, J., & Barthelemy, R. (2016). Enriching gender in physics education research: A binary past and a complex future. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12, 020114. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020114
Troche, S. J., & Kunz, A. (2020). The factorial structure and construct validity of a German translation of Dweck’s Implicit Theories of Intelligence Scale under consideration of the wording effect. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 62(3), 386–403.
University of Pittsburgh. (2021). Student diversity dashboard. Retrieved from https://www.diversity.pitt.edu/social-justice/student-dashboard
Van Dusen, B., & Nissen, J. (2020). Associations between learning assistants, passing introductory physics, and equity: A quantitative critical race theory investigation. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16, 010117. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.010117
Vincent-Ruz, P., Binning, K., Schunn, C., & Grabowski, J. (2018). The effect of math SAT on women’s chemistry competency beliefs. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(1), 342–351. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00137A
Vooren, M., Haelermans, C., Groot, W., & van den Brink, H. M. (2022). Comparing success of female students to their male counterparts in the STEM fields: an empirical analysis from enrollment until graduation using longitudinal register data. International Journal of STEM Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00318-8
Voyer, D., & Voyer, S. (2014). Gender differences in scholastic achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1174–1204. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036620
Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2011). A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes among minority students. Science, 331(6023), 1447–1451. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1198364
Whitcomb, K., & Singh, C. (2020). For physics majors, gender differences in introductory physics do not inform future physics performance. European Journal of Physics, 41, 065701. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/ab9f1d
Whitcomb, K. M., Kalender, Z. Y., Nokes-Malach, T. J., Schunn, C. D., & Singh, C. (2021). Comparison of self-efficacy and performance of engineering undergraduate women and men. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(6), 1996–2014. https://www.ijee.ie/1atestissues/Vol36-6/24_ijee4004.pdf
Yeager, D., & Dweck, C. (2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 302–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.722805
Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2020). What can be learned from growth mindset controversies? American Psychologist, 75(9), 1269–1284. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000794
Yeager, D. S., Hanselman, P., Walton, G. M., Murray, J. S., Crosnow, R., Muller, C., Tipton, E., Schneider, B., Hinojosa, C. P., Paunesku, D., Romero, C., Flint, K., Roberts, A., Troll, J., Iachan, R., Buontempo, J., Yang, S. M., & Carvalho, C,… Dweck, C.S. (2019). A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement. Nature, 573(7774), 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1466-y
Yeager, D. S., Romero, C., Paunesku, D., Hulleman, C. S., Schneider, B., Hinojosa, C., Lee, H. Y., O’Brien, J., Flint, K., Roberts, A., Trott, J., Greene, D., Walton, G. M., & Dweck, C. S. (2016). Using design thinking to improve psychological interventions: The case of the growth mindset during the transition to high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 374–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000098
Yik, B. J., Raker, J. R., Apkarian, N., Stains, M., Henderson, C., Dancy, M. H., & Johnson, E. (2022). Evaluating the impact of malleable factors on percent time lecturing in gateway chemistry, mathematics, and physics courses. International Journal of STEM Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00333-3
Zeidner, M. (1998). Test anxiety: the state of the art. Plenum Press.
Zimmerman, B. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016