Abell, S., & Lederman, N. (2007). Handbook on research in science education. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Google Scholar
ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission. (2004). ABET criteria for accrediting engineering programs. Baltimore: ABET, Inc. Author.
Google Scholar
Achterhuis, H. (Ed.). (2001). American philosophy of technology: the empirical turn. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Google Scholar
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1989). Science for all Americans. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1978). Reflections on self-efficacy. In S. Rachman (Ed.), Advances in behavior research and therapy (Vol. 1, pp. 237–269). Oxford: Pergamon.
Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Google Scholar
Barak, M. (2012). Teaching engineering and technology: cognitive, knowledge and problem-solving taxonomies. Journal of Engineering, Design, and Technology, 11(3), 316–333.
Article
Google Scholar
Barnett, J., & Hodson, D. (2001). Pedagogical context knowledge: toward a fuller understanding of what good science teachers know. Science Education, 85(4), 426–453.
Article
Google Scholar
Breiner, J., Harkness, M., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3–11.
Article
Google Scholar
Berlin, D. F., & White, A. L. (1995). Connecting school science and mathematics. In P. A. House & A. F. Coxford (Eds.), Connecting mathematics across the curriculum. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Google Scholar
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
Article
Google Scholar
Burghardt, M. D., & Hacker, M. (2004). Informed design: a contemporary approach to design pedagogy as the core process in technology. The Technology Teacher, 64, 6–8.
Google Scholar
Bybee, R. (2010). Advancing STEM education: a 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30–35.
Google Scholar
Carlson, L. E., & Sullivan, J. F. (1999). Hands-on engineering: learning by doing in the integrated teaching and learning program. The International Journal of Engineering Education, 15(1), 20–31.
Google Scholar
Cavanagh, S. (2008). Where is the ‘T’ in STEM? Education Week, 27(30), 17–19.
Google Scholar
Clark, J. V. (Ed.). (2014). Closing the achievement gap from an international perspective: Transforming STEM for effective education. Dordrecht: Springer.
Google Scholar
DeVries, M. J. (Ed.). (2011). Positioning Technology Education in the Curriculum. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Google Scholar
English, L. (2016). STEM education K-12: perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(3), 1–8.
Google Scholar
Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farra, Straus, and Giroux.
Google Scholar
Feenberg, A. (2006). What is philosophy of technology? In J. R. Dakers (Ed.), Defining Technological Literacy-Towards an Epistemological Framework (pp. 5–16). New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Frykholm, J., & Glasson, G. (2005). Connecting science and mathematics instruction: pedagogical context knowledge for teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 105(3), 127–141.
Article
Google Scholar
Herschbach, D. (2009). Technology education: Foundations and perspectives. Homewood: American Technical Publishers, Inc.
Google Scholar
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: what and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.
Article
Google Scholar
Hoachlander, G., & Yanofsky, D. (2011). Making STEM real: by infusing core academics with rigorous real-world work, linked learning pathways prepare students for both college and career. Educational Leadership, 68(3), 60–65.
Google Scholar
International Technology Education Association. (1996). Technology for all Americans: A rationale and structure for the study of technology. Reston: Author.
Google Scholar
International Technology Education Association. (2000/2002/2007). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Reston: Author.
International Technology Education Association. (2003). Advancing excellence in technological literacy: Student assessment, professional development, and program standards. Reston: Author.
Google Scholar
Kennedy, T., & Odell, M. (2014). Engaging students in STEM education. Science Education International, 25(3), 246–258.
Google Scholar
Kolodner, J. L. (2002). Facilitating the learning of design practices: lessons learned from an inquiry into science education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 39(3), 1–31.
Google Scholar
Kolodner, J. L. (2006). Case-based reasoning. In K. L. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of learning sciences (pp. 225–242). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Kolodner, J. L., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., & Puntembakar, S. (2003). Putting a student-centered Learning by Design™ curriculum into practice: lessons learned. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495–548.
Article
Google Scholar
Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., & Fredricks, J. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: initial attempts by middle school students. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3–4), 313–350.
Article
Google Scholar
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Levine, T. H., & Marcus, A. S. (2010). How the structure and focus of teachers’ collaborative activities facilitate and constrain teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 389–398.
Article
Google Scholar
Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Freeman, B., & Roberts, K. (2013). STEM: Country comparisons. Melbourne: Australian Council of Learned Academies.
Google Scholar
Mitcham, C. (1994). Thinking through Technology: The Path between Engineering and Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Moore, T., Stohlmann, M., Wang, H., Tank, K., Glancy, A., & Roehrig, G. (2014). Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education. In S. Purzer, J. Strobel, & M. Cardella (Eds.), Engineering in Pre-College Settings: Synthesizing Research, Policy, and Practices (pp. 35–60). West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.
Google Scholar
Nadelson, L., Seifert, A., Moll, A., & Coats, B. (2012). i-STEM summer institute: an integrated approach to teacher professional development in STEM. Journal of STEM Education, 13(2), 69–83.
Google Scholar
National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council [NAE & NRC]. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. Washington: National Academies Press.
Google Scholar
National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council [NAE & NRC]. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Washington: National Academies Press.
Google Scholar
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM), Commission on Standards for School Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston VA: The Council. http://www.standards.nctm.org.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: The Council. http://www.standards.nctm.org.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Washington: Authors.
Google Scholar
National Research Council [NRC]. (1989). Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education. Washington: National Academy Press.
Google Scholar
National Research Council. [NCR]. (1994). National Science Education Standards. Washington: National Academy Press.
Google Scholar
National Research Council [NRC]. (1996). National Science Education Standards. National Committee for Science Education Standards and Assessment. Washington: National Academies Press.
Google Scholar
National Research Council [NRC]. (2000a). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition. Washington: The National Academies Press.
Google Scholar
National Research Council [NRC]. (2000b). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning. Washington: National Academies Press.
Google Scholar
National Research Council [NRC]. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington: National Academies Press.
Google Scholar
National Research Council [NRC]. (2012). A framework for K12 science education: Practices, cross cutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington: National Academies Press.
Google Scholar
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington: The National Academies Press.
Google Scholar
Powell-Moman, A. D., & Brown-Schild, V. B. (2011). The influence of a two-year professional development institute on teacher self-efficacy and use of inquiry-based instruction. Science Educator, 20(2), 47–53.
Google Scholar
Purzer, S., Goldstein, M., Adams, R., Xie, C., & Nourian, S. (2015). An exploratory study of informed engineering design behaviors associated with scientific explanations. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(9), 1–12.
Google Scholar
Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.
Article
Google Scholar
President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). (2010). Prepare and inspire: K-12 education in science, technology, engineering, and math (stem) for America’s future. Washington: Author.
Google Scholar
Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20–26.
Google Scholar
Stohlmann, M., Moore, T., & Roehrig, G. (2012). Considerations for teaching integrated STEM education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research., 2(1), 28–34. doi:10.5703/1288284314653.
Article
Google Scholar
Thomas, B., & Watters, J. (2015). Perspectives on Australian, Indian and Malaysian approaches to STEM education. International Journal of Educational Development, 45(November 2015), 42–53.
Article
Google Scholar
Tillman, D., An, S., Cohen, J., Kjellstrom, W., & Boren, R. (2014). Exploring wind power: improving mathematical thinking through digital fabrication. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia., 23(4), 401–421.
Google Scholar
Wang, H., Moore, T. J., Roehrig, G. H., & Park, M. S. (2011). STEM integration: teacher perceptions and practice. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 1(2), 1–13. doi:10.5703/1288284314636.
Google Scholar
Williams, D. (2007). The what, why, and how of contextual teaching in a mathematics classroom. The Mathematics Teacher., 100(8), 572–575.
Google Scholar