Abraham, MR, & Renner, JW. (1986). The sequence of learning cycle activities in high school chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(2), 121–143.
Article
Google Scholar
Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2005) Liberal Education and America’s Promise. Retrieved 19 December 2017, from https://www.aacu.org/leap
Bailey, CP, Minderhout, V, Loertscher, J. (2012). Learning transferable skills in large lecture halls: Implementing a POGIL approach in biochemistry. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 40(1), 1–7.
Article
Google Scholar
Bean, J. (2016). Set assignments in an explicit, real-world context. Retrieved 19 December 2017, from https://serc.carleton.edu/sp/library/qr/designing_assignments.html#real
Beatty, ID, Gerace, WJ, Leonard, WJ, Dufresne, RJ. (2006). Designing effective questions for classroom response system teaching. American Journal of Physics, 74(1), 31–39.
Article
Google Scholar
Blasco-Arcas, L, Buil, I, Hernández-Ortega, B, Sese, FJ. (2013). Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance. Computers & Education, 62, 102–110.
Article
Google Scholar
Bogen, J, & Woodward, J. (1988). Saving the phenomena. The Philosophical Review, 97(3), 303–352.
Article
Google Scholar
Borrego, M, Froyd, JE, Hall, TS. (2010). Diffusion of engineering education innovations: A survey of awareness and adoption rates in US engineering departments. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(3), 185–207.
Article
Google Scholar
Boscardin, C, & Penuel, W. (2012). Exploring benefits of audience-response systems on learning: A review of the literature. Academic Psychiatry, 36(5), 401–407.
Article
Google Scholar
Caldwell, JE. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 9–20.
Article
Google Scholar
Campbell, T, Schwarz, C, Windschitl, M. (2016). What we call misconceptions may be necessary stepping-stones toward making sense of the world. Science and Children, 53(7), 28.
Article
Google Scholar
Castillo-Manzano, JI, Castro-Nuño, M, López-Valpuesta, L, Sanz-Díaz, MT, Yñiguez, R. (2016). Measuring the effect of ARS on academic performance: A global meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 96, 109–121.
Article
Google Scholar
Chari, DN, Nguyen, HD, Zollman, DA, & Sayre, EC. (2017). Student and instructor framing in upper-division physics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.05103.
Chi, MT, & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243.
Article
Google Scholar
Chien, YT, Chang, YH, Chang, CY. (2016). Do we click in the right way? A meta-analytic review of clicker-integrated instruction. Educational Research Review, 17, 1–18.
Article
Google Scholar
Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 13–20.
Article
Google Scholar
de Jong, T. (2006). Technological advances in inquiry learning. Science, 312, 532–533.
Article
Google Scholar
de Jong, T, & Van Joolingen, WR. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 179–201.
Article
Google Scholar
Dori, YJ, Mevarech, ZR, Baker, DR (Eds.) (2017). Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM education: Learning, teaching and assessment, (vol. 24). Chas, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG.
Douglas, EP, & Chiu, CC (2009). Use of guided inquiry as an active learning technique in engineering. In Proceedings of the 2009 research in engineering education symposium.
Google Scholar
Dreyfus, BW, Elby, A, Gupta, A, Sohr, ER. (2017). Mathematical sense-making in quantum mechanics: An initial peek. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 020141.
Article
Google Scholar
Duncan, D (2005). Clickers in the classroom: How to enhance science teaching using classroom response systems. New York: Addison Wesley and Benjamin Cummings.
Google Scholar
Eberlein, T, Kampmeier, J, Minderhout, V, Moog, RS, Platt, T, Varma-Nelson, P, White, HB. (2008). Pedagogies of engagement in science. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 36(4), 262–273.
Article
Google Scholar
Elicker, JD, & McConnell, NL. (2011). Interactive learning in the classroom: Is student response method related to performance? Teaching of Psychology, 38(3), 147–150.
Article
Google Scholar
Engelbrecht, J, Bergsten, C, Kågesten, O. (2012). Conceptual and procedural approaches to mathematics in the engineering curriculum: Student conceptions and performance. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 138–162.
Article
Google Scholar
Ericsson, KA (2006). Protocol analysis and expert thought: Concurrent verbalizations of thinking during experts’ performance on representative tasks. In The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance, (pp. 223–242).
Chapter
Google Scholar
Farrell, JJ, Moog, RS, Spencer, JN. (1999). A guided-inquiry general chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(4), 570.
Article
Google Scholar
Felder, RM, & Brent, R. (2010). The National Effective Teaching Institute: Assessment of impact and implications for faculty development. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(2), 121–134.
Article
Google Scholar
Fies, C, & Marshall, J. (2006). Classroom response systems: A review of the literature. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(1), 101–109.
Article
Google Scholar
Ford, CL, & Yore, LD (2012). Toward convergence of critical thinking, metacognition, and reflection: Illustrations from natural and social sciences, teacher education, and classroom practice. In A Zohar, YJ Dori (Eds.), Metacognition in science education, (pp. 251–271). Dordrecht: Springer-Verlag.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Ford, MJ, & Forman, EA. (2006). Chapter 1: Redefining disciplinary learning in classroom contexts. Review of Research in Education, 30(1), 1–32.
Article
Google Scholar
Freeman, S, Eddy, SL, McDonough, M, Smith, MK, Okoroafor, N, Jordt, H, Wenderoth, MP. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415.
Article
Google Scholar
Gardner, GE, & Jones, MG. (2011). Pedagogical preparation of the science graduate teaching assistant: Challenges and implications. Science Educator, 20(2), 31.
Google Scholar
Geertz, C (1994). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In Readings in the philosophy of social science, (pp. 213–231).
Google Scholar
Glass, GV, McGaw, B, Smith, ML (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Google Scholar
Grawe, N. (2016). Developing quantitative reasoning. Retrieved 19 December 2017, from https://serc.carleton.edu/sp/library/qr/index.html
Hake, RR. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74.
Article
Google Scholar
Hanson, D, & Wolfskill, T. (2000). Process workshops—a new model for instruction. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(1), 120.
Article
Google Scholar
Hora, MT, Oleson, A, Ferrare, JJ (2013). Teaching dimensions observation protocol (TDOP) user’s manual. Madison: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
Google Scholar
Hunsu, NJ, Adesope, O, Bayly, DJ. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of audience response systems (clicker-based technologies) on cognition and affect. Computers & Education, 94, 102–119.
Article
Google Scholar
Kay, RH, & LeSage, A. (2009). Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 53(3), 819–827.
Article
Google Scholar
Keselman, A. (2003). Supporting inquiry learning by promoting normative understanding of multivariable causality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(9), 898–921.
Article
Google Scholar
Koretsky, M., Bouwma-Gearhart, J., Brown, S. A., Dick, T., Brubaker-Cole, S. J., Sitomer, A., Quardokus Fisher, K., Risien, J., Little, D. L., Smith, C., & Ivanovitch, J. D. (2015). Enhancing STEM Education at Oregon State University. Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, Washington. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.24002
Koretsky, MD, Brooks, BJ, Higgins, AZ. (2016). Written justifications to multiple-choice concept questions during active learning in class. International Journal of Science Education, 38(11), 1747–1765.
Article
Google Scholar
Koretsky, MD, Falconer, JL, Brooks, BJ, Gilbuena, DM, Silverstein, DL, Smith, C, Miletic, M. (2014). The AiChE Concept Warehouse: A web-based tool to promote concept-based instruction. Advances in Engineering Education, 4(1), 7:1–27.
Kuo, E, Hull, MM, Gupta, A, Elby, A. (2013). How students blend conceptual and formal mathematical reasoning in solving physics problems. Science Education, 97(1), 32–57.
Article
Google Scholar
Lantz, ME. (2010). The use of ‘clickers’ in the classroom: Teaching innovation or merely an amusing novelty? Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 556–561.
Article
Google Scholar
Laws, P., Sokoloff, D., and Thornton, R. “Promoting active learning using the results of physics education research.” UniServe Science News 13 (1999)
Google Scholar
Lehrer, R. (2009). Designing to develop disciplinary dispositions: Modeling natural systems. American Psychologist, 64(8), 759.
Article
Google Scholar
Lesh, RA, & Doerr, HM (2003). Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lewis, SE. (2011). Retention and reform: An evaluation of peer-led team learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(6), 703–707.
Article
Google Scholar
Lewis, SE, & Lewis, JE. (2005). Departing from lectures: An evaluation of a peer-led guided inquiry alternative. Journal of Chemical Education, 82(1), 135.
Article
Google Scholar
Lewis, SE, & Lewis, JE. (2008). Seeking effectiveness and equity in a large college chemistry course: An HLM investigation of peer-led guided inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(7), 794–811.
Article
Google Scholar
Lin, X. (2001). Designing metacognitive activities. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(2), 23–40.
Article
Google Scholar
MacArthur, JR, & Jones, LL. (2008). A review of literature reports of clickers applicable to college chemistry classrooms. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9(3), 187–195.
Article
Google Scholar
MacKay, B. (2016). Teaching with visualizations. Retrieved 19 December 2017, from https://serc.carleton.edu/sp/library/visualizations/index.html
Mathematical Association of America. (1994). Retrieved 19 December 2017, from https://www.maa.org/programs/faculty-and-departments/curriculum-department-guidelines-recommendations/quantitative-literacy/quantitative-reasoning-college-graduates
Mayer, RE, Stull, A, DeLeeuw, K, Almeroth, K, Bimber, B, Chun, D, … Zhang, H. (2009). Clickers in college classrooms: Fostering learning with questioning methods in large lecture classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(1), 51–57.
Article
Google Scholar
Mazur, E (1997). Peer instruction: A user’s manual. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar
National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Research Council (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Research Council (2011). Learning science through computer games and simulations. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Research Council (2012). Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
National Research Council (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Nelson, C, Hartling, L, Campbell, S, Oswald, AE. (2012). The effects of audience response systems on learning outcomes in health professions education. A BEME systematic review: BEME guide no. 21. Medical Teacher, 34(6), e386–e405.
Article
Google Scholar
Nicol, DJ, & Boyle, JT. (2003). Peer instruction versus class-wide discussion in large classes: A comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom. Studies in Higher Education, 28(4), 457–473.
Article
Google Scholar
Norton, L, Richardson, TE, Hartley, J, Newstead, S, Mayes, J. (2005). Teachers’ beliefs and intentions concerning teaching in higher education. Higher Education, 50(4), 537–571.
Article
Google Scholar
Pedaste, M, Mäeots, M, Siiman, LA, De Jong, T, Van Riesen, SA, Kamp, ET, … Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61.
Article
Google Scholar
Penuel, WR, Abrahamson, L, Roschelle, J (2006). Theorizing the transformed classroom: sociocultural interpretation. In Audience response systems in higher education: Applications and cases, (p. 187).
Chapter
Google Scholar
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.
Article
Google Scholar
Prince, M, Vigeant, M, Nottis, K. (2016). Repairing student misconceptions in heat transfer using inquiry-based activities. Chemical Engineering Education, 50(1), 52–61.
Google Scholar
Prosser, M, & Trigwell, K. (1993). Development of an approaches to teaching questionnaire. Research and Development in Higher Education, 15, 468–473.
Google Scholar
Rogers, EM (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.
Google Scholar
Russ, RS, & Odden, TOB. (2017). Intertwining evidence-and model-based reasoning in physics sensemaking: An example from electrostatics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 020105.
Article
Google Scholar
Schoenfeld, AH (1987). What’s all the fuss about metacognition? In AH Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education, (pp. 198–215). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Google Scholar
Schwab, JJ (1964). Structure of the disciplines: Meanings and significances. In GW Ford, L Pugno (Eds.), The structure of knowledge and the curriculum, (pp. 6–30). Chicago: Rand McNally.
Google Scholar
Seymour, E (2005). Partners in innovation: Teaching assistants in college science courses. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Speer, NM. (2008). Connecting beliefs and practices: A fine-grained analysis of a college mathematics teacher’s collections of beliefs and their relationship to his instructional practices. Cognition and Instruction, 26(2), 218–267.
Article
Google Scholar
Tanenbaum, C. (2016). STEM 2026: A vision for innovation in STEM education.
Google Scholar
Thompson, AG (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, (pp. 127–146). New York: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Macmillan.
Google Scholar
Veenman, MVJ (2012). Metacognition in science education: Definitions, constituents, and their intricate relation with cognition. In A Zohar, YJ Dori (Eds.), Metacognition in science education, (pp. 21–36). Dordrecht: Springer-Verlag.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Vos, H, & De Graaff, E. (2004). Developing metacognition: A basis for active learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 29(4), 543–548.
Article
Google Scholar
Wheatley, GH. (1991). Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematics learning. Science Education, 75(1), 9–21.
Article
Google Scholar
Wilson, CD, Taylor, JA, Kowalski, SM, Carlson, J. (2010). The relative effects and equity of inquiry-based and commonplace science teaching on students’ knowledge, reasoning, and argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), 276–301.
Google Scholar
Zacharia, ZC, Manoli, C, Xenofontos, N, de Jong, T, Pedaste, M, van Riesen, SA, … Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Identifying potential types of guidance for supporting student inquiry when using virtual and remote labs in science: A literature review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(2), 257–302.
Article
Google Scholar
Zimmerman, C. (2000). The development of scientific reasoning skills. Developmental Review, 20(1), 99–149.
Article
Google Scholar