Skip to main content

Table 5 Mediation analyses showing the direct, indirect, and total effects for the hypothesized model paths

From: Exploring the multifaceted roles of mathematics learning in predicting students' computational thinking competency

Path

Direct effect

Mediator

Indirect effect

Total effect

Mediation

β

p

β

p

β

p

NM–ML

− 0.121

0.155

AM

0.269

< 0.001

0.148

0.061

Full

NM–LLCT

0.144

0.058

AM

− 0.016

0.736

0.125

0.064

None

   

ML

− 0.051

0.187

0.093

0.171

None

   

AM–ML

0.113

< 0.001

0.257

< 0.01

Full

NM–HLCT

0.022

0.701

AM

0.030

0.450

0.052

0.247

None

   

ML

− 0.045

0.181

− 0.023

0.718

None

   

LLCT

0.049

0.091

0.071

0.259

None

   

AM–LLCT

− 0.005

0.742

0.017

0.778

None

   

ML–LLCT

− 0.017

0.210

0.005

0.933

None

   

AM–ML

0.101

< .001

0.123

0.064

Full

   

AM–ML–LLCT

0.038

< .01

0.060

0.289

Full

AM–LLCT

− 0.029

0.727

ML

0.203

< .001

0.174

< 0.05

Full

AM–HLCT

0.054

0.434

ML

0.181

< .001

0.235

< 0.001

Full

   

LLCT

− 0.010

0.733

0.044

0.566

None

   

ML–LLCT

0.069

< 0.001

0.123

0.084

Full

ML–HLCT

0.375

< .001

LLCT

0.142

< 0.001

0.517

< 0.001

Partial

  1. NM: beliefs about the nature of mathematics; AM: attitude towards mathematics; ML: mathematical literacy; LLCT: lower level CT; HLCT: higher level CT