Adams, RS, Turns, J, & Atman, CJ. (2003). Educating effective engineering designers: the role of reflective practice. Design Studies, 24(3), 275–294.
Article
Google Scholar
Apedoe, XS, Reynolds, B, Ellefson, MR, & Schunn, CD. (2008). Bringing engineering design into high school science classrooms: the heating/cooling unit. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(5), 454–465.
Article
Google Scholar
Apedoe, XS, & Schunn, CD. (2013). Strategies for success: uncovering what makes students successful in design and learning. Instructional Science, 41(4), 773–791.
Article
Google Scholar
Ball, LJ, & Christensen, BT. (2009). Analogical reasoning and mental simulation in design: two strategies linked to uncertainty resolution. Design Studies, 30(2), 169–186.
Article
Google Scholar
Baker, RS, Corbett, AT, & Wagner, AZ. (2006). Human classification of low-fidelity replays of student actions. In Proceedings of the Educational Data Mining Workshop at the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems.
Google Scholar
Brophy, S, Klein, S, Portsmore, M, & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in P-12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 369–387.
Article
Google Scholar
Bruner, JS. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31, 21–32.
Google Scholar
Bucciarelli, LL. (1996). Designing engineers. Cambridge: MIT Press. Chapter 1–2, 6.
Google Scholar
Burghardt, MD, & Hacker, M. (2004). Informed design: a contemporary approach to design pedagogy as the core process in technology. The Technology Teacher, 64(1), 6–8.
Google Scholar
Cajas, F. (2001). The science/technology interaction: implications for science literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 715–729.
Article
Google Scholar
Crismond, DP, & Adams, RS. (2012). The informed design teaching and learning matrix. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 738–797.
Article
Google Scholar
Cross, N. (2001). Design cognition: results from protocol and other empirical studies of design activity. In CM Eastman, WM McCracken, & W Newstetter (Eds.), Design Learning and Knowing: Cognition in Design Education. New York: Elsevier Press.
Google Scholar
Cross, N. (2006). Designerly ways of knowing. London: Springer. Chapter 1–2.
Google Scholar
Daugherty, J, & Mentzer, N. (2008). Analogical reasoning in the engineering design process and technology education applications. Journal of Technology Education, 19(2), 7–21.
Google Scholar
Doppelt, Y, Mehalik, MM, Schunn, CD, Silk, E, & Krysinski, D. (2008). Engagement and achievements: a case study of design-based learning in a science context. Journal of Technology Education, 19(2), 22–39.
Google Scholar
Dorst, K. (2011). The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application. Design Studies, 32(6), 521–532.
Article
Google Scholar
Dubberly, H. (2004). How do you design? A compendium of models. Dubberly Design Office, San Francisco CA. [–Retrieved from http://www.dubberly.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/ddo_designprocess.pdf]
Fish, J, & Scrivener, SA. (1990). Amplifying the mind’s eye: sketching and visual cognition. Leonardo, 23(1), 117–126.
Article
Google Scholar
Goel, V, & Pirolli, P. (1992). The Structure of design problem spaces. Cognitive Science, 16(3), 395–429.
Article
Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 123–143.
Article
Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, G, & Smolkov, M. (2006). Variances in the impact of visual stimuli on design problem solving performance. Design Studies, 27(5), 549–569.
Article
Google Scholar
Hmelo, CE, Holton, DL, & Kolodner, JL. (2000). Designing to learn about complex systems. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(3), 247–298.
Article
Google Scholar
Jonassen, DH. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85.
Article
Google Scholar
Jonassen, DH. (2012). Designing for decision making. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(2), 341–359.
Article
Google Scholar
Kolko, J. (2010). Abductive thinking and sensemaking: the drivers of design synthesis. Design Issues, 26(1), 5–28.
Article
Google Scholar
Kolodner, JL. (2002). Facilitating the learning of design practices: lessons from an inquiry into science education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 39(3), 9–40.
Google Scholar
Kolodner, JL, Crismond, D, Fasse, BB, Gray, JT, Holbrook, J, Ryan, M, et al. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: putting a learning-by-design curriculum into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495–548.
Article
Google Scholar
Lachapelle, CP, & Cunningham, CM. (2014). Engineering in elementary schools. In S Purzer, J Strobel, & ME Cardella (Eds.), Engineering in pre-college settings: synthesizing research, policy, and practices. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
Google Scholar
Lawson, B, & Dorst, K. (2009). Design expertise. Oxford, UK: Architectural Press (Elsevier).
Google Scholar
Lewis, T. (2006). Design and inquiry: bases for an accommodation between science and technology education in the curriculum? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(3), 255–281.
Article
Google Scholar
National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Google Scholar
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Google Scholar
National Research Council. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: understanding the status and improving the prospects. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Google Scholar
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Google Scholar
Achieve. (2013). Next generation science standards: for states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Google Scholar
Paletz, S, Schunn, CD, & Kim, KH. (2013). The interplay of conflict and analogy in multidisciplinary teams. Cognition, 126(1), 1–19.
Article
Google Scholar
Papadouris, N. (2012). Optimization as a reasoning strategy for dealing with socioscientific decision‐making situations. Science Education, 96(4), 600–630.
Article
Google Scholar
Penner, DE, Giles, ND, Lehrer, R, & Schauble, L. (1997). Building functional models: designing an elbow. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 125–143.
Article
Google Scholar
Purzer, Ş, Strobel, J, & Cardella, ME. (2014). Engineering in pre-college settings: synthesizing research, policy, and practices. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
Google Scholar
Sadler, PM, Coyle, HP, & Schwartz, M. (2000). Engineering competitions in the middle school classroom: key elements in developing effective design challenges. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(3), 299–327.
Article
Google Scholar
Scholten, M, & Sherman, SJ. (2006). Tradeoffs and theory: the double-mediation model. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 135, 237–261 and 552.
Article
Google Scholar
Schön, DA. (1993). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Google Scholar
Schnittka, C, & Bell, R. (2011). Engineering design and conceptual change in science: addressing thermal energy and heat transfer in eighth grade. International Journal of Science Education, 33(13), 1861–1887.
Article
Google Scholar
Schunn, CD, Silk, EM, & Apedoe, XS. (2012). Engineering in and for science education. In J Shrager & S Carver (Eds.), The journey from child to scientist: Integrating cognitive development and the education sciences (pp. 207–225). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Snetsinger, C, Brewer, C, & Brown, F. (1999). Capture the wind: students get a charge from wind energy. The Science Teacher, 66, 38–42.
Google Scholar
Subramanian, K. (1999). Practical physics. The Science Teacher, 66, 37–39.
Google Scholar
Svihla, V, & Petrosino, AJ. (2008). Improving our understanding of K-12 engineering education. Paper presented at the International Conference on Engineering Education. Greece: Heraklion.
Google Scholar
Valkenburg’s, R. (1998). The reflective practice of design teams. Design Studies, 19(3), 249–271.
Article
Google Scholar
Vattam, SS, & Kolodner, JL. (2008). On foundations of technological support for addressing challenges facing design-based science learning. Pragmatics & Cognition, 16(2), 406–437.
Article
Google Scholar
Xie, C, Zhang, H, Nourian, S, Pallant, A, & Bailey, S. (2014a). A study of the instructional sensitivity of CAD logs based on time series analysis. International Journal of Engineering Education, 30(4), 760–778.
Google Scholar
Xie, C, Zhang, H, Nourian, S, Pallant, A, & Hazzard, E. (2014b). A time series analysis method for assessing engineering design processes using a CAD tool. International Journal of Engineering Education, 30(1), 218–230.
Google Scholar
Zhang, Z, Xie, C, & Nourian, S. (2014). Detecting iterative cycles of engineering design from student digital footprints in computer-aided design software. Poster presented at the 2014 International Conference of the Learning Sciences. Boulder CO: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Google Scholar
Zubrowski, B. (2002). Integrating science into design technology projects: using a standard model in the design process. Journal of Technology Education, 13(2), 47–65.
Google Scholar