Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of institutional change tactics across institutions

From: STEM education institutional change projects: examining enacted approaches through the lens of the Four Categories of Change Strategies Model

 

Tactics common across more than one institutiona

Tactics unique to institution A

Tactics unique to institution B

Tactics unique to institution C

Category I—Encouraging: adoption and support

Workshops and educational development opportunities

Teaching resources for particular audiences

Support for travel to professional development workshops (B&C)

Intentional engagement of academic leaders

Sharing of local DBER results with faculty

Role-based professional development (e.g., workshops for advisors and TAs)

Availability of student outcomes data to faculty to improve outcomes

Professional development for

departmental liaisons

Category II—Fostering: connections and community

Faculty Learning Communities and Communities of Practice

Peer observation programs

Faculty presentations at teaching symposia (A&C)

Faculty retreats (A&B)

Collaborative course redesign projects (B&C)

Faculty recognition (B&C)

  

Facilitated departmental conversations

Departmental liaison activities

Category III—Institutionalizing: policies and structures

Assessment and Remodeling of classroom

Policy and Practice work (e.g., new teaching evaluation process; updated tenure and promotion policy; new hiring language; course grading policy)

Data collection (interviews, surveys, observations)

Hires, creation of new structures for teaching support

Implementation of Peer Advisors (esp. for transfer students)

Intentional use of institutional data (e.g., about student success)

Financial support for disciplines not directly supported by the grant

Category IV—Facilitating: meaning-making

 

Assessment and research projects aimed to understand and then influence the institutional landscape of STEM teaching and learning

Building collaborative relationships (among team members and beyond) to support change

Retreats supported teaching-related thinking/meaning-making

Engagement of academic leaders fostered a shared understanding of project goals

Engagement and dialogue as part of seminar series

Stimulated discussion/ exploration within departments

Collaborative projects were expected to share results at the department level

  1. aTactics in this column were enacted by all three institutions, unless otherwise noted