Skip to main content

Table 5 Hypothesis tests for RQ #2 (differences in engagement by the dimension of engagement)

From: Using intensive longitudinal methods to quantify the sources of variability for situational engagement in science learning environments

Level

Hypothesis about dimension of engagement

M difference in variance (SE)

Individual

Affective–behavioral

0.037 (0.012), p = 0.002

Individual

Behavioral–cognitive

− 0.154 (0.017), p < 0.001

Individual

Affective–cognitive

− 0.117 (0.015), p < 0.001

Situation

Affective–behavioral

0.09 (0.011), p < 0.001

Situation

Behavioral–cognitive

0.03 (0.011), p = 0.003

Situation

Affective–cognitive

0.119 (0.013), p < 0.001

Classroom

Affective–behavioral

0.087 (0.028), p = 0.001

Classroom

Behavioral–cognitive

− 0.101 (0.029), p < 0.001

Classroom

Affective–cognitive

0.014 (0.032), p = 0.323