Skip to main content

Table 2 Kruskal–Wallis test: motivation pattern by four co-curricular groups

From: Co-curricular engagement among engineering undergrads: do they have the time and motivation?

 

NEVER participated

Participated in previous years NOT this year

Participated in ONLY this year (2020–2021)

Participated BOTH this and previous years

  

Mean (S.D.)

Mean (S.D.)

Mean (S.D.)

Mean (S.D.)

H value

ε2

Intrinsic interest

0.14 (1.15)

− 0.23 (1.03)

− 0.17 (0.98)

0.08 (0.95)

1.14

0.02

Attainment

− 0.08 (0.89)

− 0.55 (1.60)

− 0.06 (0.98)

0.17 (1.00)

1.36

0.02

Utility

0.28 (0.94)

− 0.51 (1.32)

− 0.01 (0.94)

− 0.08 (1.05)

2.22

0.03

Task effort cost

0.46 (1.11)

0.35 (1.00)

− 0.21 (0.97)

− 0.15 (0.91)

4.50

0.06

Task outside effort cost

0.67 (0.83)

0.22 (0.47)

0.04 (0.83)

− 0.43** (1.06)

13.23**

0.18

Loss of alternatives

0.50 (0.91)

− 0.29 (1.31)

0.04 (0.96)

− 0.27 (0.97)

5.98

0.08

Emotion cost

0.22 (1.19)

0.26 (1.14)

0.07 (0.87)

− 0.22 (0.97)

2.50

0.03

  1. Pairwise comparisons are reported. The reference group is “students who never participated in co-curriculars
  2. The significance values have been adjusted by Bonferroni correction for multiple tests; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01