From: Perceived network bridging influences the career commitment decisions of early career teachers
Variable | Description | Example survey items |
---|---|---|
Teacher identity variables | ||
 Self-image (SI) | This variable describes a teacher’s perception of themselves relative to an idealized teacher | “I truly enjoy being a science [or math] teacher” “The quality of my teaching contributes to my career advancement.” Data represent the sum of scores from items grouped by factor analysis and conform to a four-point Likert scale (Strongly, Somewhat agree, Somewhat-, Strongly disagree) |
 Community action | This variable describes a teacher’s perception of their position in the broader teaching discipline community. Emphasis may be more aligned to group interactions in the community compared to the CoP2 factor below | “I belong to professional associations or groups of science [or math] teachers” “I feel part of a community of math [or science] teachers.” Data represent the sum of scores from items grouped by factor analysis and conform to a four-point Likert scale (Strongly, Somewhat agree, Somewhat-, Strongly disagree) |
 Community value | This variable describes a teacher’s perception of their position in the teaching discipline community. Emphasis may be more aligned to one-on-one interactions in the community compared to the CoP1 factor above | “It is helpful to be able to discuss the progress of students with colleagues” “I enjoy sharing ideas and resources about teaching science [or math].” Data represent the sum of scores from items grouped by factor analysis and conform to a four-point Likert scale (Strongly, Somewhat agree, Somewhat-, Strongly disagree) |
 Social respect | This variable describes a teacher’s perception of their identity relative to public or popular opinion | “It is important that my good teaching be recognized in some ways” “I appreciate it when my institutions acknowledge my success as a math [or science] teacher.” Data represent the sum of scores from items grouped by factor analysis and conform to a four-point Likert scale (Strongly, Somewhat agree, Somewhat-, Strongly disagree) |
VNS variables | ||
 Size | This variable describes a count of the total number of contacts in a teacher’s CoP network | Up to ten contacts could be listed at each geographic level [school, district, state, (inter)national] for a maximum overall network size of 40 contacts |
 Density | This variable describes a teacher’s perception of the degree of interconnectedness between contacts in their CoP network | In your opinion, which of the network diagrams best approximates the degree of interconnectedness in your own network of professional interactions at the school level? None/A few/About half/Most/All [1/2/3/4/5] |
 Bridging | This variable describes a teacher’s perception of how often they serve as a bridge between contacts who would not otherwise be connected in their CoP network (not separate geographic levels) | Rate the extent to which you think you occupy a bridge position in your overall personal network of professional contacts related to teaching content and/or pedagogy Zero—Many [1/2/3/4/5] |
 Reach | This variable describes a teacher’s perception of how extensive their network is based on the number of contacts that each of their contacts maintains in their CoP network | In your opinion, which of the network diagrams best approximates your overall personal network of professional contacts related to teaching content and/or pedagogy? Few—Many [1/2/3/4] |