Skip to main content

Table 1 Model constructs, definitions, and references

From: The exploration of continuous learning intention in STEAM education through attitude, motivation, and cognitive load

Constructs

Definition

Theory

References

Perceived usefulness

The degree to which a student believes that studying the STEAM teaching materials designed by the researchers would enhance their learning performance

TAM

Davis, (1989); Davis et al., (1989)

Perceived ease of use

The degree to which a learner believes that the STEAM teaching materials ease studying

TAM

Perceived enjoyment

The extent to which a learner perceives that the STEAM teaching activity in this study is enjoyable

TAM

Learning attitude

The degree of a learner’s attitude toward learning STEAM

TAM

Learning intention

The degree of a learner’s continuance intention of learning STEAM

TAM

Mental load

The degree of a learner’s difficulty of understanding the STEAM materials designed by the researchers of this study

Cognitive load

(Paas, (1992); Paas et al., (2003) (Trujillo, (2019)

Mental effort

The degree of neurocognitive process, that is, the extent of information processing and resource allocation by a student to understand and finish the task in the STEAM teaching activity

Cognitive load

Attention

The degree of the STEAM learning materials’ ability to stimulate curiosity or attract a student’s attention

ARCS

Keller, (1983)

Relevance

The degree of relevance of the STEAM learning materials felt by a learner (higher the relevance, the higher the learner’s learning motivation)

ARCS

Confidence

The level of confidence felt by a learner about being able to finish the learning task in the STEAM teaching activity

ARCS

Satisfaction

The extent to which a learner is pleased or satisfied with the STEAM learning contents

ARCS

  1. TAM technology acceptance model, ARCS attention, relevance, confidence, and satisfaction, STEAM science, technology, engineering, arts, and math