Skip to main content

Table 11 Comparison of URM professional identity with perceived instructional barriers

From: The STEM Faculty Instructional Barriers and Identity Survey (FIBIS): development and exploratory results

 

Sub-construct

Non-URM faculty (n = 62), Mean (SD)

URM faculty (n = 7), Mean (SD)

EBIP implementation

% Low-effort EBIPs

62.50 (27.07)

57.14 (27.82)

% Medium-effort EBIPs

33.47 (20.72)

28.57 (17.25)

% High-effort EBIPs

32.80 (29.87)

38.09 (35.63)

Perceived barriers

Students

2.31 (.66)

2.26 (.64)

Departmental

1.68 (.81)

1.60 (.71)

Faculty beliefs

2.06 (.61)

1.78 (.73)

Limited supports

1.76 (.61)

1.60 (.71)

Prior experiences

1.38 (.67)

1.43 (.73)

Professional identity

Work-based

3.94 (.72)

3.93 (.51)

Self-based teaching

4.39 (.54)

4.52 (.71)

Skill-based teaching

4.55 (.53)

4.50 (.71)

Self-based research

4.18 (.99)

4.43 (.68)

Skill-based research

4.40 (.88)

4.51 (.73)

  1. Perceived barriers on a scale from 1 = not at all a barrier to 5 = all of the time a barrier. Professional identity on a scale from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree