Skip to main content
Fig. 5 | International Journal of STEM Education

Fig. 5

From: Participation and performance on paper- and computer-based low-stakes assessments

Fig. 5

A comparison between CBT and PPT administered concept inventories and attitudinal surveys based on AS model 3 and CI model 3. Error bars are 1 standard error. All of the differences between CBTs and PPTs were small, none of the differences were statistically significant, and neither assessment condition was consistently higher than the other. These results indicate that there is no difference in performance between assessments administered as CBTs and those administered as PPTs

Back to article page