Table 3 Example comments from panelists by dimension

Peer Interactions

C1: There seems to be too many of these. The variations are subtle even from a teacher’s viewpoint. “Negotiates roles within the group” and “Divides work towards task completion” seem very similar.

C2:“Monitors tasks/projects with peers” and “Checks for understanding regarding process and/or content” also seem very similar. To clarify it might be beneficial to lump these together.

Positive Communication

C1: Within respecting others ideas you may want to include acknowledging whether ideas were offered at all.

C2: This might be the dimension to place something about compromising or taking turns.

Inquiry Rich/Multiple Paths

C1: An attribute might be added that relates to students conducting research including communication with experts in the field.

C2: Does this include how students interact when one person decides that there needs to be a change of path?

Authentic Approach and Tasks

C1: I would use some combination of “negotiates methods or materials” and “uses tools collaboratively” as they are closely related.

C2: I think the attribute could use an additional research-related dimension since the rubric is assessing the authenticity of the task.

Transdisciplinary Thinking

C1: Some of this could be covered under “positive communication.”

C2: Two attributes about multiple disciplines are not necessary.