Skip to main content

Table 1 Final codebook and code frequency for interview data

From: Stakeholder perspectives on hiring teaching-focused faculty at research-intensive universities

Code

Sub-code

Description

No. of interviews

Comparisons to research-focused professor series

Neutral or positive

Positive comparison made that paint Professors of Teaching as being equal to the research-focused professors

24

Negative

Negative comparisons made that paint Professors of Teaching as being unequal to the research-focused professors (Cadez et al., 2017)

14

Teaching culture

 

When the participant refers to teaching from the department or university perspective (Cox et al., 2011)

24

Ease the burden

 

Hiring motivation of Professors of Teaching in order to reduce the load of teaching and service for research-focused professors at the department/university level (Bush et al., 2017)

24

Impact

Internal impact

Influences others on campus that may include sharing teaching practices or research results with colleagues on campus

24

External impact

Influences others externally/beyond campus by sharing teaching practices or research results, for example through conference presentations or by obtaining external grant funding (Bush et al., 2020)

22

Integration

Positive

Professors of Teaching being integrated on campus or in the department

23

Negative

Professors of Teaching not being integrated on campus or in the department (Cadez et al., 2017)

24

Intended roles

Future

Roles of Professors of Teaching in the future and any future plans to hire additional Professors of Teaching

23

Historical

Historical roles of Professor of Teaching and any historical hiring considerations, including financial considerations. (Bush et al., 2017)

24

LPSOE name implications

 

Impacts or associations with the official name of the Professors of Teaching series (formally called LPSOE). (Harlow et al., 2020)

24

Promotion expectations

Percentages

Percentage breakdown of common faculty tasks (teaching, research, and service) such as 60% teaching, 30% research, and 10% service

16

Research

Relationship between promotion and research being conducted by Professors of Teaching

24

Teaching

Relationship between promotion and teaching being conducted by Professors of Teaching

25

Service

Relationship between promotion and service being performed by Professors of Teaching

18

Unclear/unfair

Promotion expectations being either unclear or unfair for the Professors of Teaching

25

Support

External support

Grant or other financial funding not being provided by the home institution

3

Internal support (non-start-up)

Grant or other financial funding being provided by the home institution

14

Internal start-up support

Any financial support given at the beginning of a Professor’s of Teaching employment

15

Lack of financial support

Lack of financial support given at the beginning or throughout a Professor’s of Teaching employment. (Harlow et al., 2020)

6

Mentorship

Non-financial support being provided that takes the form of professional guidance and development

22

Professional Development

Opportunities for professional development

14

Unexpected contributions

 

Unexpected benefits and contributions by the Professors of Teaching

13

Value

 

Complimentary comments said about the Professors of Teaching

25