Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary statistics of the percentage of time spent on each of the COPUS codes by faculty type

From: Predicting implementation of active learning by tenure-track teaching faculty using robust cluster analysis

Dataset

Code

Tenure-track

F

p-value

Yes

Yes

No

Teaching faculty

Research faculty

Lecturers

1,3,4,5

Student.L

80.85 (16.37)

95.37 (6.59)

93.38 (11.29)

5.04

0.01*

S.Receiving/

     

S.Minimal

     

1,5

Student.AnQ

18.45 (18.31)

6.52 (12.65)

14.41 (22.27)

2.14

0.12

1,5

Student.WC

0.00 (0.97)

0.00 (0.49)

0.00 (1.03)

1.00

0.37

1,5

Student.SP

0.00 (0.00)

0.00 (0.00)

0.00 (0.00)

–

–

1,5

Student.Ind

12.42 (15.69)

1.96 (5.99)

4.00 (11.52)

9.79

\(<0.001\)*

1,5

Student.Prd

0.00 (0.00)

0.00 (0.00)

0.00 (0.00)

–

–

1,5

Student.TQ

0.00 (0.00)

0.00 (0.00)

0.00 (0.00)

–

–

1,5

Student.W

0.00 (1.57)

1.92 (3.10)

0.64 (3.10)

2.20

0.12

1,5

Student.O

0.00 (1.58)

0.00 (1.68)

0.00 (1.06)

1.00

0.37

1,2,5

Student.SQ

10.16 (11.58)

6.74 (8.15)

6.33 (7.86)

1.55

0.22

1,2,5

Student.CG

1.93 (11.26)

0.00 (1.87)

0.00 (9.86)

1.75

0.18

1,2,5

Student.WG

1.28 (7.10)

0.00 (1.54)

0.00 (0.00)

1.96

0.14

1,2,5

Student.OG

5.85 (12.60)

0.00 (1.01)

0.00 (6.45)

5.87

< 0.001*

3,5

S.Working

39.48 (24.26)

7.11 (22.62)

20.30 (23.95)

14.50

< 0.001*

3,5

S.Talking

27.77 (24.66)

16.27 (21.31)

23.77 (19.48)

2.47

0.09

3,4,5

S.Other

1.92 (3.61)

2.96 (3.02)

1.96 (4.32)

0.17

0.85

4,5

S.Interactive

26.32 (27.41)

2.94 (16.46)

14.23 (20.96)

10.92

< 0.001*

4,5

S.Thinking

15.89 (18.61)

3.25 (8.55)

4.56 (12.25)

9.46

< 0.001*

4,5

S.Few

27.11 (21.83)

16.07 (21.72)

22.39 (19.48)

2.07

0.13

1,5

Instructor.RtW

12.34 (27.91)

11.13 (59.29)

25.85 (36.48)

1.30

0.28

1,5

Instructor.DV

1.28 (5.12)

1.25 (6.75)

2.44 (6.76)

0.15

0.86

1,5

Instructor.FUp

21.32 (20.55)

10.58 (13.92)

17.88 (20.09)

5.89

< 0.001*

1,5

Instructor.AnQ

10.53 (12.11)

6.64 (8.69)

6.92 (7.78)

1.66

0.20

1,5

Instructor.MG

11.84 (24.43)

0.00 (5.76)

0.00 (13.72)

11.32

< 0.001*

1,3,5

Instructor.Adm/

8.81 (7.77)

6.68 (8.24)

7.69 (7.33)

1.92

0.15

I.Administration

     

1,5

Instructor.W

0.64 (3.29)

0.61 (3.10)

0.64 (3.22)

0.02

0.98

1,5

Instructor.O

0.81 (4.39)

0.00 (2.96)

0.00 (1.83)

0.58

0.56

1,2,5

Instructor.Lec

54.70 (28.58)

84.46 (21.09)

70.54 (25.90)

7.96

< 0.001*

1,2,5

Instructor.PQ

20.86 (18.09)

8.18 (17.77)

18.71 (20.96)

1.83

0.16

1,2,5

Instructor.CQ

6.00 (15.92)

0.00 (7.53)

0.00 (12.86)

2.33

0.10

1,2,5

Instructor.1o1

2.56 (6.32)

0.00 (0.00)

0.00 (3.27)

5.78

< 0.001*

3,4,5

I.Presenting/

67.00 (24.96)

87.75 (14.53)

80.57 (18.22)

6.24

< 0.001*

I.Minimal

     

3,5

I.Guiding

70.67 (23.82)

36.41 (37.26)

50.65 (23.71)

14.26

< 0.001*

3,5

I.Other

3.66 (7.81)

2.04 (6.31)

3.28 (6.49)

0.17

0.84

4,5

I.Interactive

12.89 (23.67)

0.00 (6.63)

0.67 (13.79)

11.68

< 0.001*

4,5

I.Thinking

36.87 (22.73)

16.8 (24.73)

31.3 (24.19)

4.27

0.02

4,5

I.Few

33.75 (18.54)

20.83 (20.09)

23.72 (19.95)

7.46

< 0.001*

4,5

I.Miscellaneous

14.00 (15.00)

8.21 (11.79)

11.80 (13.59)

0.81

0.45

  1. Mean and standard deviation (in parentheses) are given as well as the F statistic and p-value for testing if there is a difference in the amount of time spent on a code across the three faculty types. Significance is denoted for codes using a Bonferroni correction of \(\alpha ^* = 0.05/38 = 0.0013\)