Skip to main content

Table 14 Expert review outline

From: Measuring science self-efficacy with a focus on the perceived competence dimension: using mixed methods to develop an instrument and explore changes through cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses in high school

Part

Interview content

Part 1

Discuss whether the item corresponds to the science self-efficacy and corresponding task level shown in Fig. 1

If not, please give your comments and suggestions

Part 2

Discuss whether the items in each level are sufficient to represent the measure of students’ science self-efficacy

What other items should be included or excluded in the current version? Why or why not? Please provide comments and suggestions

Part 3

Discuss whether the item expression, wording, and language issues are appropriate

1. Were the item statements clearly expressed? Please point out the items and provide detailed comments

2. Was there any wording or language issues that might be confusing to you? Please point out these items and provide detailed comments

3. Are there any suggestions for the improvement of those item statements? Please point out these items and provide detailed comments

Part 4

Provide an overall evaluation and suggestions for further improvement of the instrument