Skip to main content
International Journal of STEM Education
Fig. 4 | International Journal of STEM Education

Fig. 4

From: Raising attainment for low-scoring students through quectures: an analysis of achievement and engagement with personalised learning in lectures

Fig. 4

The effect of quecture engagement on course score for different prior performance cohorts. Least squares means and standard errors (corrected for between-year and sample size differences) are plotted for each cohort quecture combination from the 2017, 2018 and 2019 iterations of the course combined. Quartiles A–D were of equal size within each year (50 students in 2017, 83 or 84 students in 2018 and 79 or 80 students in 2019) while group E contained 65 students from 2017 and 2019, and 67 students from 2018. QH  high quecture engagers, QL low quecture engagers, Q0 students that did not engage with quectures. Whilst overall quecture engagers (QH and QL) have higher scores than Q0 (P < 0.0005), the benefits of quecture engagement varied among cohorts (P = 0.0198) with most benefit for cohorts A, D and E. * p < 0.05 **, p < 0.01, *** p < 0.005, n.s. = not significant

Back to article page