The influences of student- and school-level factors on engineering undergraduate student success outcomes: A multi-level multi-school study

International Journal of STEM Education

Table 1 School information

School ID	State	Type	US	PS	STF Ratios	RR	GR	DR	Tuition
1	OH	PRV	2030	156	12	0.72	0.66	0.79	32.6
2	OH	PUB	46,900	7720	19	0.94	0.87	0.65	11.5
3	OH	PUB	28,370	4890	18	0.86	0.71	0.79	12.1
4	OH	PRV	1140	96	8	0.79	0.53	0.77	36.7
5	PA	PRV	1590	96	8	0.98	0.97	0.37	54.6
6	PA	PRV	3430	546	13	0.83	0.68	0.68	34.5
7	PA	PRV	2660	680	10	0.93	0.89	0.65	55.7
8^a	PA	PRV	1290	133	11	0.73	0.66	0.80	29.0
9^a	PA	PRV	3100	132	11	0.75	0.55	0.70	34.2
10	PA	PUB	40,640	7910	15	0.88	0.73	0.65	18.4
11	PA	PRV	3620	710	9	0.92	0.88	0.74	58.2
12	PA	PUB	23,380	2730	14	0.93	0.84	0.70	19.7
13	MA	PRV	2530	88	8	0.94	0.89	0.49	54.2
14^a	MA	PRV	14,200	3040	16	0.99	0.90	0.44	55.5
15	KY	PUB	21,930	2400	16	0.85	0.66	0.75	12.4
16	MS	PUB	18,790	1880	17	0.82	0.64	0.73	8.9
17	CT	PUB	18,840	2490	16	0.94	0.83	0.54	17.8
18^a	IA	PUB	28,290	7020	18	0.87	0.74	0.75	9.3

Tuition was presented in every $1000; university size was rounded up to the tenth
PRV private, PUB public, US university size, PS program size, STF student-to-faculty, RR retention rate, GR 4-year graduation rate, DR racial diversity rate
^aIndicates the school was removed from the analysis for having less than 10 student responses