Skip to main content

Table 1 Number and identification of interviewees from universities classified as research intensive (Group of Eight, Go8), Australian Technology Network (ATN) or Innovative Research University (IRU)

From: Understanding STEM academics’ responses and resilience to educational reform of academic roles in higher education

Interviewee number

Name of institution

Classification of university

Level of academic

Gender

1

Australian National University

Go8

E

M

2

Monash University

Go8

D

F

3

University of Tasmania

N/A

C

F

4

Office of the Chief Scientist

N/A

N/A

F

5

University of Melbourne

Go8

D

F

6

Western Sydney University

IRU

E

M

7

University of Technology, Sydney

ATN

E

M

8

University of Queensland

Go8

D

F

9

University of Sydney

Go8

E

F

10

University of Queensland

Go8

D

F

11

Australian National University

Go8

E

M

12

University of New South Wales

Go8

D

F

13

University of Queensland

Go8

C

F

14

Australian National University

Go8

E

F

15

Australian National University

Go8

E

M

16

Flinders University

IRU

E

F

17

Australian National University

Go8

D

F

18

Australian National University

Go8

E

F

19

University of Queensland

Go8

D

F

20

Monash University

Go8

E

F

21

Monash University

Go8

D

M

22

University of Queensland

Go8

B

F

23

University of Queensland

Go8

D

F

24

University of Sydney

Go8

E

F

25

University of Queensland

Go8

C

M

26

University of Technology Sydney

ATN

C

F

27

Monash University

Go8

D

M

28

University of Sydney

Go8

E

M

29

University of New South Wales

Go8

D

M

30

Private Organisation

N/A

N/A

F

31

University of Technology, Sydney

ATN

E

M

32

University of Sydney

Go8

D

F

  1. Academic level of appointment (from Professor level E to B mid-career academic) and gender (male, female) is provided
  2. N/A not applicable