Table 4 COPUS and AIM protocol results for each case study subject
Protocol category | Peter | Celeste | Phillip | Travis (RU)a | Travis (CC1)a |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPUS | |||||
Active engagement (%) | 97 | 34 | 9 | 80 | 70 |
Passive engagement (%) | 3 | 66 | 91 | 20 | 30 |
Breakdown of active engagement | |||||
Answering questions (%) | 86 | 27 | 75 | 40 | 57 |
Other group work (%) | 14 | 4 | 5 | ||
Student questions (%) | 4 | 10 | 14 | ||
ABCD discussion (%) | 19 | 25 | 25 | ||
Whole class discussion (%) | 27 | ||||
Group worksheet (%) | 19 | 5 | |||
ABCD questions (%) | 14 | ||||
Individual work (%) | 10 | ||||
Predicting (%) | 5 | ||||
AIM | |||||
Content | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
Initial ideas | 2 | N/A | N/A | 3 | 1 |
Examples/phenomena | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
Evidence | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 | N/A |
Sense-making | 1 | 3 | N/A | 2 | 2 |
Classroom culture | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 |