Skip to main content

Table 4 Summary of alter and action types for FGC and CGC students during the second timeframe, during engineering undergraduate studies

From: Understanding first-generation undergraduate engineering students’ entry and persistence through social capital theory

Alter

Action type, FGC [example]

Action type, CGC [example]

Middle/High School Teacher

Expressive [encouraged to persist], Instrumental [helped with homework]

Instrumental [helped with homework]

Parents and Intergenerational Family Members

Expressive [encouraged to persist]

Expressive [encouraged to persist]

Sibling

Instrumental [suggested study tips]

N/A

Employer or Coworker

Instrumental [shared content knowledge about subdisciplines], Expressive [helped student feel they could be successful as engineer]

Instrumental [shared content knowledge about subdisciplines]

Peers

Expressive [shared own struggles], Instrumental [suggested coursework and professors]

Expressive [shared own struggles], Instrumental [suggested coursework and professors]

Professors, Academic Advisors, and Program Directors

Expressive [normalized students’ feelings and struggles], Instrumental [connected to job opportunities]

Expressive [encouraged to persist], Instrumental [connected to job opportunities]

Graduate Students

Expressive [took interest in students], Instrumental [gave insight about graduate pathways]

Expressive [took interest in students], Instrumental [gave insight about graduate pathways]

Professional Organization Contacts

Instrumental [gave career advice]

Instrumental [gave career advice]