Table 3 List of frameworks related to faculty decision-making and use of EBIPs
| Â | Framework name | Foci |
|---|---|---|
Lattuca & Pollard, 2016 | Model of faculty decision-making about curricular and instructional change | Model includes external, internal, and individual influences that affect faculty motivation and, in turn, their decision to use EBIPs |
Austin, 2011 | A systems approach to understanding faculty members’ teaching-related decisions | The concentric circles of this model feature external context, institution, college/department, and the faculty member upon which reward systems, PD, leadership, and work allocation act |
Buehl & Beck, 2014 | Relationship between teachers’ beliefs and practices in a system of internal and external supports and hindrances | This K-12 model shows the relationships between teacher beliefs and practices couched within a variety of external and internal supports and hindrances including national and state level factors, district and school factors, classroom factors, and teacher beliefs, experience, and self-awareness/reflection |
Andrews & Lemons, 2015 | Innovation-decision making model | Innovation-decision model of higher education biology instructors explaining how instructors adopt, sustain, and improve their implementation of pedagogical innovations |
Woodbury & Gess-Newsome, 2002 | TCSR Model for a college classroom | Model includes contextual and personal factors affecting teacher thinking and practice, which affects implementation of classroom reform |
Gess-Newsome, Southerland, Johnston, & Woodbury, 2003 | Interventions, dissatisfactions, and changes in personal practical theories as influences on the enactment of reform | Model showing key interventions, dissatisfactions, changes in personal practical theories, and dense versus porous contextual barriers that may lead to changed instructional practice |
Rogers, 2003 | Innovation-decision model | Model of faculty decision-making that shows such decisions occur over time in five stages: (1) knowledge about the innovation, (2) persuasion about the benefits of the innovation, (3) decision to use the innovation, (4) implementation of the innovation, and (5) confirmation of continued implementation of the innovation |