Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 12 Percentage of faculty who implement EBIPs in each department

From: The STEM Faculty Instructional Barriers and Identity Survey (FIBIS): development and exploratory results

  Soc Sci (n = 5) Biology (n = 9) Chemistry (n = 7) Physics/Astr (n = 10) Math (n = 11) Comp Sci (n = 5) Engr (n = 20)
SCALE-UP 0.0 11.1 28.6 0.0 36.4 0.0 35.0
Cooperative learning 0.0 33.3 42.9 10.0 9.1 60.0 20.0
Peer instruction 0.0 22.2 57.1 50.0 27.3 20.0 20.0
POGIL 20.0 22.2 57.1 10.0 45.5 40.0 30.0
Simulations 0.0 33.3 57.1 50.0 45.5 40.0 25.0
Just-in-time teaching 20.0 44.4 71.4 60.0 45.5 100.0 35.0
Case studies 40.0 77.8 57.1 20.0 18.2 80.0 55.0
PBL 20.0 44.4 85.7 30.0 36.4 60.0 65.0
Think-pair-share 60.0 44.4 85.7 30.0 63.6 60.0 55.0
Collab. learning 40.0 100.0 100.0 50.0 72.7 80.0 90.0
Interactive lecture 60.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 63.6 100.0 80.0
  1. Bolded numbers are for EBIPs implemented by the majority (> 50%) of participants in the department. Italicized numbers represent less than 25% of participant EBIP implementation in the department