Skip to main content

Table 4 Pairwise comparisons of individual characteristics by instructional style

From: Individual and situational factors related to undergraduate mathematics instruction

Fig.

Item

Global test statistics

Post hoc comparisons

Extensive moderate

Extensive limited

Moderate limited

6

How many years have you been teaching upper-division mathematics courses?

H = 7.552, n = 219, p = .023

E > M (p = .028)

E ~ L

M ~ L

How many times have you taught abstract algebra?

H = 6.370, n = 219, p = .041

E ~ M

E > L (p = .043)

M ~ L

7

I think lecture is the best way to teach.

H = 63.391, n = 215, p < .001

E > M (p < .001)

E > L (p < .001)

M > L (p < .001)

I think lecture is the only way to teach that allows me to cover the necessary content.

H = 61.125, n = 213, p < .001

E > M (p < .001)

E > L (p < .001)

M > L (p < .001)

I think there is enough time for all the content I need or want to teach.

H = 2.215, n = 216, p = .330

E ~ M

E ~ L

M ~ L

When I last taught algebra, I had enough time during class to help students understand difficult ideas.

H = 1.690, n = 216, p = .430

E ~ M

E ~ L

M ~ L

When I last taught algebra, I felt pressured to go through the material quickly to cover all the required topics.

H = 3.515, n = 215, p = .172

E ~ M

E ~ L

M ~ L

8

I think students learn better when they do mathematical work (in addition to taking notes and attending to the lecture) in class.

H = 27.508, n = 214, p < .001

E < M (p < .001)

E < L (p < .001)

M ~ L

I think students learn better when they struggle with the ideas prior to me explaining the material to them.

H = 18.045, n = 213, p < .001

E ~ M

E < L (p < .001)

M < L (p = .016)

I think students learn better if I first explain the material to them and then they work to make sense of the ideas for themselves.

H = 29.526, n = 215, p < .001

E ~ M

E > L (p < .001)

M > L (p < .001)

I think that all students can learn advanced mathematics.

H = 14.438, n = 215, p = .001

E ~ M

E < L (p < .001)

M > L (p = .015)

I think all students can learn abstract algebra.

H = 14.049, n = 214, p = .001

E ~ M

E < L (p = .001)

M ~ L

9

Interest in teaching abstract algebra.

H = 1.080, n = 215, p = .583

E ~ M

E ~ L

M ~ L

Interest in teaching other advanced classes.

H = .498, n = 214, p = .780

E ~ M

E ~ L

M ~ L

Interest in discussing/reading about how students learn key ideas in abstract algebra.

H = 7.368, n = 215, p = .025*

E ~ M

E < L (p = .048)

M ~ L

Interest in doing/reading research that could be considered the scholarship of teaching and learning.

H = 7.307, n = 216, p = .026*

E ~ M

E < L (p = .033)

M ~ L

Interest in doing research in abstract algebra.

H = 6.582, n = 214, p = .037*

E ~ M

E > L (p = .033)

M ~ L

  1. *As before, the family-wise error rate for the global tests was controlled by use of the Holm-Bonferroni correction by cluster for 7 and 8 items (unnecessary for the items in 6). For the items in 9, strict adherence to the FWER correction would dictate that none of the five global tests achieved statistical significance (despite 3 p values < .05). As this was an exploratory study, we have elected to perform post hoc tests in spite of this, but advise the reader to interpret these results with caution