From: Using social network analysis to develop relational expertise for an instructional change initiative
 | A | B | C | D | E | F | G |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Individuals in the network | |||||||
 Number surveyed in unit | 21 | 34 | 36 | 57 | 40 | 26 | 47 |
 Response rate within unit | 71% | 50% | 39% | 56% | 43% | 77% | 57% |
 Number of members of other units included in the network | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Organization of ties in the network | |||||||
 Number of components | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 6 |
 Individuals in main component | 16 | 20 | 11 | 22 | 14 | 22 | 19 |
 Density | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.02 |
 Centralization (total degree) | 31% | 23% | 17% | 7% | 13% | 28% | 8% |
 Subgroup modularity | 0.35 | 0.46 | 0.30 | 0.67 | 0.61 | 0.47 | 0.72 |
 Subgroup number | 5 | 6 | 5 | 10 | 7 | 6 | 10 |