Skip to main content

Table 5 HGLMs comparing student participation on the CBT and PPT pretest and posttests

From: Participation and performance on paper- and computer-based low-stakes assessments

Final estimation of fixed effects with robust standard errors

 

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

 

Coef.

p

Coef.

p

Coef.

p

CBT pre π1

 For intercept 2 β10

  For intercept 3 γ100

0.679

< 0.001

0.256

0.434

− 0.671

0.081

Practices γ101

0.214

0.116

0.182

0.097

 Gender γ110

0.269

0.086

 D grade γ120

0.142

0.699

 C grade γ130

0.558

0.077

 B grade γ140

1.102

0.002

 A grade γ150

1.526

< 0.001

CBT post π2

 For intercept 2 β20

  For intercept 3 γ200

0.296

0.118

−0.767

0.008

− 2.678

< 0.001

  Practices γ201

0.534

< 0.001

0.573

< 0.001

 Gender γ210

0.207

0.281

 D grade γ220

0.946

0.013

 C grade γ230

1.395

< 0.001

 B grade γ240

2.057

< 0.001

 A grade γ250

2.390

< 0.001

PPT pre π3

 For intercept 2 β30

  For intercept 3 γ300

2.290

< 0.001

2.266

< 0.001

1.361

< 0.001

 Gender γ310

0.130

0.619

 D grade γ320

0.496

0.281

 C grade γ330

0.675

0.062

 B grade γ340

0.835

0.042

 A grade γ350

0.909

0.049

PPT post π4

 For intercept 2 β40

  For intercept 3 γ400

1.235

< 0.001

1.235

< 0.001

−0.706

0.047

 Gender γ410

0.224

0.180

 D grade γ420

1.522

0.001

 C grade γ430

1.514

< 0.001

 B grade γ440

2.166

< 0.001

 A grade γ450

2.493

< 0.001

Level 1 and level 2 variance

 CBT pre r1

1.080

1.080

0.805

 CBT post r2

1.170

1.390

1.077

 PPT pre r3

1.130

1.440

1.156

 PPT post r4

1.100

1.200

0.889

Level 3 variance

 CBT pre u10

0.820

0.700

0.740

 CBT post u20

1.220

0.670

0.830

 PPT pre u30

0.560

0.485

0.690

 PPT post u40

1.340

1.370

1.180