Skip to main content

Table 7 Comparative behavior change patterns (at risk vs no/low risk), n = 167

From: Adolescents as agents of healthful change through scientific literacy development: A school-university partnership program in New Zealand

  

Pre-intervention to 12 months post-intervention behavior change

  

T0 behavior category = risk

T0 behavior category = no/low risk

 

Food item

Self-reported consumption pattern defined as indicating risk

n

% Negative change towards greater risk

% No change

% Positive change towards no/low-risk category

% Positive change into the no/low-risk category

n

% Retains position in no/low-risk category

% Negative change into at risk category

Odds ratio T0-risk/T0-no/low-risk T0–T4 change towards opposite category

Potato chips (crisps)

> once/week

69

5.8

52.2

7.2

34.8

94

80.9

19.1

3.1 (95% CI 1.2 to 6.2), χ2(1) = 10.15, p < .001*

Fried food (e.g., hot chips, fried chicken, burgers)

≥ once per week

93

9.7

53.8

17.2

19.4

66

66.7

33.3

1.2 (95% CI 0.6 to 2.2), χ2(1) = 0.18, p = .671

Soft drinks (fizzy, cordials, sports drinks)

≥ 2–4 times per week

41

7.3

48.8

4.9

39.0

123

87.8

12.2

5.6 (95% CI 2.5 to 12.8), χ2(1) = 19.23, p < .001*

Sweet snacks (e.g., biscuit, muesli bar, sweet (candy))

> 2–4 times per week

28

N/A

50.0

N/A

50.0

131

82.4

17.6

4.696 (95% CI 1.974 to 11.173), χ2(1) = 13.60, p < .001*

Green vegetables (e.g., spinach, beans, lettuce)

< Daily

58

10.3

50.0

5.2

34.5

101

84.2

15.8

3.5 (95% CI 1.7 to 7.4), χ2(1) = 11.29, p = .001*

Starchy vegetables (e.g., sweet potato, potato, pumpkin)

≤ once per week

26

3.8

23.1

7.7

65.4

133

91.0

9.0

27.3 (95% CI 9.6 to 78.2), χ2(1) = 56.85, p < .001*

Fruit (e.g., apples, pears, bananas)

< Daily

57

14.0

40.4

17.5

28.1

109

84.9

15.1

5.7 (95% CI 2.7 to 12.0), χ2(1) = 56.85, p < .001*

Raw fruits and vegetables

< Daily

88

19.3

28.4

29.5

22.7

74

73.0

27.0

3.0 (95% CI 1.5 to 5.7), χ2(1) = 10.61, p = .001*

  1. T0 pre-intervention, T2 6–12 weeks post-intervention, T4 12 months post-intervention, n number, p*significant (α = 0.05). The effect of T0 response group (“at risk” vs “low/no risk”) on change response was measured using ordinal logistic regression with proportional odds