Skip to main content

Table 5 Percent of faculty aware of the indicated EBIPs. Results are displayed as the percent of faculty selecting statement 3 (I am familiar…) or higher. EBIPs familiar to two thirds or more of the faculty are bolded; EBIPs familiar to less than half of the faculty are italicized

From: The importance of context: an exploration of factors influencing the adoption of student-centered teaching among chemistry, biology, and physics faculty

EBIPs

All

Biology

Chemistry

Physics

Clickers

96.6

92.0

100.0

100.0

Collaborative learning

88.1

88.0

89.5

86.7

Animations

86.4

84.0

89.5

86.7

Peer instruction

81.4

76.0

73.7

100.0

Formative assessment

79.7

84.0

89.5

60.0

Case studies

78.0

84.0

68.4

80.0

Computer simulations

72.9

60.0

84.2

80.0

Just-in-time teaching

69.5

72.0

52.6

86.7

Think-pair-share

62.7

60.0

68.4

60.0

Concept inventories

62.7

44.0

68.4

86.7

Cooperative learning

61.0

76.0

52.6

46.7

Problem-based learning

59.3

72.0

57.9

40.0

Interactive demonstrations

55.9

32.0

63.2

86.7

POGIL

49.2

44.0

52.6

53.3

SCALE-UP

44.1

52.0

36.8

40.0

Concept maps

39.0

48.0

31.6

33.3

SALG

27.1

32.0

26.3

20.0